CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the order suspending action on a proposed settlement was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. The Board found the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm, noting the judge's concerns about settlement adequacy and the lack of a certified interpreter for the Spanish-speaking applicant. The case will return to the trial level for further proceedings on the settlement's adequacy.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the order suspending action on a proposed settlement was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. The Board found the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm, noting the judge's concerns about settlement adequacy and the lack of a certified interpreter for the Spanish-speaking applicant. The case will return to the trial level for further proceedings on the settlement's adequacy.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.