Home/Case Law/SARA RUSH vs. PROCARE MOBILE RESPONSE, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SARA RUSH vs. PROCARE MOBILE RESPONSE, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Feb 21, 2018
Pomona
ADJ8390531

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a medical treatment lien disallowance for non-compliance with Labor Code § 4903.8(d), which requires a declaration from a competent person attesting to services rendered and accurate billing. The Appeals Board rescinded the initial decision, finding that the lien claimant had substantially complied with the statute. The Board held that an electronic "S" signature was sufficient and that the billing clerk, Jennifer Zambrana, was competent to make the declaration given the circumstantial evidence of treatment. Consequently, the lien was not disallowed, and the case was returned for further proceedings.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a medical treatment lien disallowance for non-compliance with Labor Code § 4903.8(d), which requires a declaration from a competent person attesting to services rendered and accurate billing. The Appeals Board rescinded the initial decision, finding that the lien claimant had substantially complied with the statute. The Board held that an electronic "S" signature was sufficient and that the billing clerk, Jennifer Zambrana, was competent to make the declaration given the circumstantial evidence of treatment. Consequently, the lien was not disallowed, and the case was returned for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.