Home/Case Law/SCOTT BOUCHER vs. HUSTON GAMBLERS, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

SCOTT BOUCHER vs. HUSTON GAMBLERS, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Mar 22, 2017
Santa Ana
ADJ7972714

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, reversing a prior decision that found California had subject matter jurisdiction. The WCAB held that while California has jurisdiction over injuries occurring in the state, it lacked a sufficient interest in this applicant's cumulative injury claim to constitutionally apply its workers' compensation law. The applicant's brief participation in only three professional football games in California over a multi-year career was deemed insufficient to establish a legitimate and substantial connection. Therefore, the WCAB rescinded the original award, and the applicant took nothing.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, reversing a prior decision that found California had subject matter jurisdiction. The WCAB held that while California has jurisdiction over injuries occurring in the state, it lacked a sufficient interest in this applicant's cumulative injury claim to constitutionally apply its workers' compensation law. The applicant's brief participation in only three professional football games in California over a multi-year career was deemed insufficient to establish a legitimate and substantial connection. Therefore, the WCAB rescinded the original award, and the applicant took nothing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.