Home/Case Law/SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

Filed: Sep 29, 2025
Anaheim
ADJ11665067

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a June 18, 2021 Findings and Order (F&O) which determined that the applicant did not sustain an industrial injury. Lien claimant Bell Community Medical Group petitioned for reconsideration, asserting that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's report established injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). Upon review, the Board rescinded the F&O and substituted new findings, concluding that applicant Sergio Alejandro Ortiz sustained industrial injury to his lumbar spine, bilateral shoulders, and right hand and wrist. Additionally, the Board found that compensation is not barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10), and the matter was returned to the trial level for further adjudication.

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a June 18, 2021 Findings and Order (F&O) which determined that the applicant did not sustain an industrial injury. Lien claimant Bell Community Medical Group petitioned for reconsideration, asserting that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's report established injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). Upon review, the Board rescinded the F&O and substituted new findings, concluding that applicant Sergio Alejandro Ortiz sustained industrial injury to his lumbar spine, bilateral shoulders, and right hand and wrist. Additionally, the Board found that compensation is not barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10), and the matter was returned to the trial level for further adjudication.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES Case Analysis

SERGIO ALEJANDRO ORTIZ vs. PINDLER & PINDLER, INC.; AMTRUST; BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.