Home/Case Law/Shadle v. Amerisure Companies
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

George Shadle, employed by Amerisure Insurance Companies as a claims adjuster, sustained a right elbow injury in May 1986 after a fall. Dr. E.B. Wilkinson, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon, diagnosed a fractured radius and ulna, noting non-union of a radial head chip, significant limitation of motion, and traumatic arthritis, assessing an 11% permanent partial impairment of the elbow. A neurologist, Dr. David L. Cunningham, found Shadle's hand numbness unrelated to the injury. The trial court initially fixed vocational disability at 11% to the right arm and denied future medical expenses. The appellate court affirmed the 11% permanent partial disability but modified the judgment to direct Amerisure Insurance Companies to provide reasonably required future medical services, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

George Shadle, employed by Amerisure Insurance Companies as a claims adjuster, sustained a right elbow injury in May 1986 after a fall. Dr. E.B. Wilkinson, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon, diagnosed a fractured radius and ulna, noting non-union of a radial head chip, significant limitation of motion, and traumatic arthritis, assessing an 11% permanent partial impairment of the elbow. A neurologist, Dr. David L. Cunningham, found Shadle's hand numbness unrelated to the injury. The trial court initially fixed vocational disability at 11% to the right arm and denied future medical expenses. The appellate court affirmed the 11% permanent partial disability but modified the judgment to direct Amerisure Insurance Companies to provide reasonably required future medical services, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies Case Analysis

Shadle v. Amerisure Companies is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.