Home/Case Law/SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT

Filed: Sep 10, 2012
San Jose
ADJ6990558

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended a prior award to allow attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5814.5. The original award found the employer unreasonably delayed a $6,000 Supplemental Job Displacement Voucher (SJDV) and imposed a 25% penalty, but denied attorney fees. The Board reversed this, holding that attorney fees are applicable when an award requires an SJDV, even if not explicitly listed, as the SJDV's entitlement was clear from the permanent disability award. The Board also affirmed the finding of unreasonable delay and the penalty, while reserving jurisdiction for the parties to determine the reasonable attorney fee.

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Jose. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Jose.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended a prior award to allow attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5814.5. The original award found the employer unreasonably delayed a $6,000 Supplemental Job Displacement Voucher (SJDV) and imposed a 25% penalty, but denied attorney fees. The Board reversed this, holding that attorney fees are applicable when an award requires an SJDV, even if not explicitly listed, as the SJDV's entitlement was clear from the permanent disability award. The Board also affirmed the finding of unreasonable delay and the penalty, while reserving jurisdiction for the parties to determine the reasonable attorney fee.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT workers compensation case in San Jose. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT case law summary from San Jose. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT Case Analysis

SHARON HAMMERLY vs. CARROWS RESTAURANT/CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP; MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Jose. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.