CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns multiple workers' compensation claims for applicant Sharon Sprague against various defendants, including CIGA and Sompo Japan. The Board denied CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming its prior decision. However, the Board granted Sprague's Petition for Reconsideration to correct a clerical error regarding her average weekly wage in one of the claims (ADJ824062). The Board otherwise affirmed its May 11, 2016 decision, leaving unresolved issues such as fibromyalgia and knee injury for further proceedings.
SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns multiple workers' compensation claims for applicant Sharon Sprague against various defendants, including CIGA and Sompo Japan. The Board denied CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming its prior decision. However, the Board granted Sprague's Petition for Reconsideration to correct a clerical error regarding her average weekly wage in one of the claims (ADJ824062). The Board otherwise affirmed its May 11, 2016 decision, leaving unresolved issues such as fibromyalgia and knee injury for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.