CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Supplemental Findings and Award. The Defendant's petition was found to misstate and present facts not in evidence, violating procedural rules. Medical evidence from AMEs Dr. Levine and Dr. Stalberg supported an industrial injury for the period of February 1999 through January 22, 2004, despite the Defendant's arguments. The Board affirmed that the applicant sustained a new period of temporary disability in 2004 due to this subsequent period of injurious exposure.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Supplemental Findings and Award. The Defendant's petition was found to misstate and present facts not in evidence, violating procedural rules. Medical evidence from AMEs Dr. Levine and Dr. Stalberg supported an industrial injury for the period of February 1999 through January 22, 2004, despite the Defendant's arguments. The Board affirmed that the applicant sustained a new period of temporary disability in 2004 due to this subsequent period of injurious exposure.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.