Home/Case Law/Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionExpedited Hearing Order

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc.

Filed: Feb 03, 2021
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2020-04-0091

CompFox AI Summary

Michael Slezak sought medical treatment and temporary disability benefits for thoracic back pain, alleging it was caused by a co-worker's misbehavior on November 7, 2019. He initially treated at American Family Care with Nurse Practitioner Daniel Fox and Dr. Chris Kromer, who released him to full duty multiple times. Despite this, Slezak continued to experience pain and later consulted orthopedist Dr. Ethan Kellum, who linked the pain to the work injury. The Court, however, denied benefits, finding that Dr. Kellum's opinion did not sufficiently establish causation under the statutory requirements, failing to overcome the presumption afforded to the authorized physician, Dr. Kromer. Furthermore, Mr. Slezak lacked medical proof of disability after Dr. Kromer's release.

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Michael Slezak sought medical treatment and temporary disability benefits for thoracic back pain, alleging it was caused by a co-worker's misbehavior on November 7, 2019. He initially treated at American Family Care with Nurse Practitioner Daniel Fox and Dr. Chris Kromer, who released him to full duty multiple times. Despite this, Slezak continued to experience pain and later consulted orthopedist Dr. Ethan Kellum, who linked the pain to the work injury. The Court, however, denied benefits, finding that Dr. Kellum's opinion did not sufficiently establish causation under the statutory requirements, failing to overcome the presumption afforded to the authorized physician, Dr. Kromer. Furthermore, Mr. Slezak lacked medical proof of disability after Dr. Kromer's release.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc. workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc. case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc. Case Analysis

Slezak, Michael v. Ryder Integ. Logistics, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.