CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Whole Foods Market seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the judge's award of additional temporary disability indemnity. The defendant's claim that the award was procured by fraud based on surveillance video was rejected because the defendant failed to disclose the video before the hearing, violating procedural rules regarding newly discovered evidence. Therefore, the defendant's petition was denied for failing to meet the requirements for submitting new evidence.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Whole Foods Market seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the judge's award of additional temporary disability indemnity. The defendant's claim that the award was procured by fraud based on surveillance video was rejected because the defendant failed to disclose the video before the hearing, violating procedural rules regarding newly discovered evidence. Therefore, the defendant's petition was denied for failing to meet the requirements for submitting new evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.