Home/Case Law/State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart
Regular Panel Decision DecisionState's Appeal

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart

Filed: Aug 02, 2005
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
07-04-0304-CR

CompFox AI Summary

The State appealed the trial court's order granting Andrew Bennett Lockhart's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. Department of Public Safety trooper Chris Ecker stopped Lockhart after observing his vehicle's right tires cross the solid white line on Interstate 40. Following a warning citation and a consensual vehicle search, marijuana was discovered, leading to Lockhart's prosecution. The trial court initially granted the motion to suppress, citing Ecker's 'hunch' and lack of observed criminal offense prior to the stop. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, deferring to the trial court's factual finding that Lockhart did cross the fog line, which provided probable cause for the traffic stop under the Texas Transportation Code. The court emphasized that an officer's subjective motive does not invalidate an objectively reasonable stop based on an observed traffic violation.

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The State appealed the trial court's order granting Andrew Bennett Lockhart's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. Department of Public Safety trooper Chris Ecker stopped Lockhart after observing his vehicle's right tires cross the solid white line on Interstate 40. Following a warning citation and a consensual vehicle search, marijuana was discovered, leading to Lockhart's prosecution. The trial court initially granted the motion to suppress, citing Ecker's 'hunch' and lack of observed criminal offense prior to the stop. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, deferring to the trial court's factual finding that Lockhart did cross the fog line, which provided probable cause for the traffic stop under the Texas Transportation Code. The court emphasized that an officer's subjective motive does not invalidate an objectively reasonable stop based on an observed traffic violation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart Case Analysis

State v. Andrew Bennett Lockhart is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.