Home/Case Law/STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL
Regular DecisionReconsideration

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL

Filed: Jul 09, 2009
Sacramento
ADJ347577 (SAC 0220919)

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board affirmed an award for applicant Stephen Flannery's back and psyche injury. Pacific Bell, the special employer, was found jointly and severally liable with the general employer's insurer, Reliance (now CIGA), for ongoing benefits, as Pacific Bell's self-insurance constitutes other insurance. The Board reversed the WCJ's award of temporary total disability beyond the five-year jurisdictional limit unless the disability straddled the anniversary date. The doctrine of laches was found inapplicable against CIGA, and CIGA was not liable for EDD's lien as Pacific Bell was the primary source of benefits.

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board affirmed an award for applicant Stephen Flannery's back and psyche injury. Pacific Bell, the special employer, was found jointly and severally liable with the general employer's insurer, Reliance (now CIGA), for ongoing benefits, as Pacific Bell's self-insurance constitutes "other insurance." The Board reversed the WCJ's award of temporary total disability beyond the five-year jurisdictional limit unless the disability straddled the anniversary date. The doctrine of laches was found inapplicable against CIGA, and CIGA was not liable for EDD's lien as Pacific Bell was the primary source of benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL workers compensation case in Sacramento. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL case law summary from Sacramento. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL Case Analysis

STEPHEN FLANNERY vs. G & O SERVICES, RELIANCE INSURANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, PACIFC BELL is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Sacramento. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.