CompFox AI Summary
Michael Doug Suddath, a farm hand, sued his employer Charles J. Parks for personal injuries sustained when he was butted by a bull on Parks' cattle farm. Suddath alleged negligence, claiming Parks failed to provide a safe workplace, warn of the bull's aggressive nature, and offer proper training. The trial court granted summary judgment to Parks. On appeal, the court affirmed the summary judgment, concluding that no genuine issues of material fact remained and that Parks had no duty to warn Suddath of an unknown aggressive propensity of the larger bull or of dangers that would be obvious to a reasonably prudent person working with such animals.
Suddath v. Parks is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Michael Doug Suddath, a farm hand, sued his employer Charles J. Parks for personal injuries sustained when he was butted by a bull on Parks' cattle farm. Suddath alleged negligence, claiming Parks failed to provide a safe workplace, warn of the bull's aggressive nature, and offer proper training. The trial court granted summary judgment to Parks. On appeal, the court affirmed the summary judgment, concluding that no genuine issues of material fact remained and that Parks had no duty to warn Suddath of an unknown aggressive propensity of the larger bull or of dangers that would be obvious to a reasonably prudent person working with such animals.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.