Home/Case Law/SUKHVINDER DHINDSA vs. SENECA FOODS CORPORATION, AIGRM
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

SUKHVINDER DHINDSA vs. SENECA FOODS CORPORATION, AIGRM

Filed: Nov 18, 2015
Stockton
ADJ9664811

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed prematurely, challenging a procedural order rather than a final decision. The applicant argued the WCJ erred in directing a panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) in orthopedics, instead of pain management. However, the Board found the petition lacked merit, as it did not demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm to justify removal. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed because no final order, decision, or award had been issued.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed prematurely, challenging a procedural order rather than a final decision. The applicant argued the WCJ erred in directing a panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) in orthopedics, instead of pain management. However, the Board found the petition lacked merit, as it did not demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm to justify removal. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed because no final order, decision, or award had been issued.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.