CompFox AI Summary
Defendant ARB, INC. and PRIMORIS SERVICES CORP., administered by THE HARTFORD, filed a petition for removal challenging an August 13, 2025, order setting the matter for trial, asserting that discovery was incomplete. Applicant Susan Gaona filed an answer, and the WCJ recommended denying removal. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board upheld the WCJ's recommendation, denying the petition. The Board emphasized that removal is an extraordinary remedy and found no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, nor that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. They also stated that parties would have the opportunity to develop the record and raise discovery issues during the trial process.
Susan Gaona vs. ARB, Inc.; Primoris Services Corp. is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant ARB, INC. and PRIMORIS SERVICES CORP., administered by THE HARTFORD, filed a petition for removal challenging an August 13, 2025, order setting the matter for trial, asserting that discovery was incomplete. Applicant Susan Gaona filed an answer, and the WCJ recommended denying removal. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board upheld the WCJ's recommendation, denying the petition. The Board emphasized that removal is an extraordinary remedy and found no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, nor that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. They also stated that parties would have the opportunity to develop the record and raise discovery issues during the trial process.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.