Home/Case Law/SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionNUNC PRO TUNC ORDER CORRECTING CLERICAL ERROR IN EARLIER DECISION

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Mar 24, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ1282717 (LBO 0332013) ADJ1437663 (LBO 0333033) ADJ1830483 (LBO 0332918)

CompFox AI Summary

This Nunc Pro Tunc Order corrects a clerical error in a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The applicant's attorney, Vernon Goldwater, was erroneously misidentified in the Award section of the January 27, 2011 Decision. The Order amends the Award nunc pro tunc to correctly identify Mr. Goldwater as the attorney entitled to a 12% fee for temporary disability indemnity. All other aspects of the January 27, 2011 Decision remain unchanged.

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Nunc Pro Tunc Order corrects a clerical error in a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The applicant's attorney, Vernon Goldwater, was erroneously misidentified in the Award section of the January 27, 2011 Decision. The Order amends the Award nunc pro tunc to correctly identify Mr. Goldwater as the attorney entitled to a 12% fee for temporary disability indemnity. All other aspects of the January 27, 2011 Decision remain unchanged.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

SUSAN RICHARDSON vs. PROSPECT HEALTH SOURCE MEDICAL GROUP, JAMES DANIEL, DANA EISENMAN, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.