CompFox AI Summary
A male inmate (petitioner) faced charges of lewd conduct and interfering with an employee after exposing his genitals to female food service workers. A tier III disciplinary hearing found him guilty, though the charge of interfering with an employee was later dismissed on administrative appeal. The subsequent CPLR article 78 proceeding confirmed the finding of guilt for lewd conduct. The court concluded that substantial evidence, including the misbehavior report and witness testimony, supported the determination, noting that the petitioner's conflicting testimony created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve.
Swinton v. Fischer is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
A male inmate (petitioner) faced charges of lewd conduct and interfering with an employee after exposing his genitals to female food service workers. A tier III disciplinary hearing found him guilty, though the charge of interfering with an employee was later dismissed on administrative appeal. The subsequent CPLR article 78 proceeding confirmed the finding of guilt for lewd conduct. The court concluded that substantial evidence, including the misbehavior report and witness testimony, supported the determination, noting that the petitioner's conflicting testimony created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.