CompFox AI Summary
The defendant sought reconsideration of a finding of 100% permanent disability, arguing for apportionment based on the PQME's opinion. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the decedent sustained 80% permanent disability after apportionment. This decision was based on Dr. Blum's opinion, which the Board considered substantial evidence for apportionment. The dissenting commissioner argued Dr. Blum's apportionment was speculative and not substantial evidence due to his deposition testimony.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The defendant sought reconsideration of a finding of 100% permanent disability, arguing for apportionment based on the PQME's opinion. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the decedent sustained 80% permanent disability after apportionment. This decision was based on Dr. Blum's opinion, which the Board considered substantial evidence for apportionment. The dissenting commissioner argued Dr. Blum's apportionment was speculative and not substantial evidence due to his deposition testimony.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.