CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Howard Terry initiated an action against the Memphis Housing Authority and its Executive Director, Robert Lipscomb, alleging sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Terry claimed Lipscomb sexually harassed him, leading to subsequent retaliatory acts such as denied overtime, job threats, diminished authority, and denied promotion. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the claims were time-barred and lacked merit. The Court granted the defendants' motion, concluding that Terry failed to establish timely Title VII claims for retaliation, hostile work environment, or failure to promote. Additionally, the § 1983 claims were dismissed as untimely and for not demonstrating a deprivation of protected liberty or property interests under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Terry v. Memphis Housing Authority is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, W.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, W.D. Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Howard Terry initiated an action against the Memphis Housing Authority and its Executive Director, Robert Lipscomb, alleging sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Terry claimed Lipscomb sexually harassed him, leading to subsequent retaliatory acts such as denied overtime, job threats, diminished authority, and denied promotion. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the claims were time-barred and lacked merit. The Court granted the defendants' motion, concluding that Terry failed to establish timely Title VII claims for retaliation, hostile work environment, or failure to promote. Additionally, the § 1983 claims were dismissed as untimely and for not demonstrating a deprivation of protected liberty or property interests under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.