Home/Case Law/TONIA OSBY-WREN vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SOUTHERN CAL EDISON ROSEMEAD
Regular Decision

TONIA OSBY-WREN vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SOUTHERN CAL EDISON ROSEMEAD

Filed: Mar 08, 2011
ADJ7136663

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant who sought a protective order to exclude an employee, Gil Aguilar, from her deposition due to alleged harassment and intimidation. The administrative law judge denied the request, finding insufficient evidence and noting the permissive nature of the relevant statute. The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as it was not a final order. However, the Board granted removal and issued a protective order barring Aguilar from the deposition, finding adequate evidence of the applicant's fear of him and that Aguilar was neither a party nor an officer.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant who sought a protective order to exclude an employee, Gil Aguilar, from her deposition due to alleged harassment and intimidation. The administrative law judge denied the request, finding insufficient evidence and noting the permissive nature of the relevant statute. The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as it was not a final order. However, the Board granted removal and issued a protective order barring Aguilar from the deposition, finding adequate evidence of the applicant's fear of him and that Aguilar was neither a party nor an officer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

TONIA OSBY-WREN vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SOUTHERN CAL EDISON ROSEMEAD (2011) – | CompFox