CompFox AI Summary
The WCAB dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal, treating it as a Petition for Reconsideration, and denied it. The Board affirmed the WCJ's order requiring the defendant to authorize surgical treatment. The defendant's initial challenge was based on a prior IMR denial, but the Board found a material change in facts occurred when the treating physician clarified the surgery's non-cosmetic, functional purpose. The Board concluded the subsequent UR certification was valid and the defendant must authorize the treatment.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The WCAB dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal, treating it as a Petition for Reconsideration, and denied it. The Board affirmed the WCJ's order requiring the defendant to authorize surgical treatment. The defendant's initial challenge was based on a prior IMR denial, but the Board found a material change in facts occurred when the treating physician clarified the surgery's non-cosmetic, functional purpose. The Board concluded the subsequent UR certification was valid and the defendant must authorize the treatment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.