Home/Case Law/Vaughn v. Trotter
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMemorandum

Vaughn v. Trotter

District Court, M.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This memorandum by Chief Judge Morton addresses the determination of attorney fees in a case where defendant Vinson Thompson was found liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The court denied the defendant's request to delay the decision based on a proposed legislative amendment that ultimately failed. Furthermore, the court rejected the defendant's arguments to reduce fees due to alleged poor record-keeping, the plaintiff not prevailing against all defendants, or for a disproportionate relationship between fees and damages, citing established Sixth Circuit precedent, particularly Northcross v. Board of Education. The court awarded $9,084.00 in attorney fees to the plaintiff's attorney, Legal Services of Middle Tennessee, and determined that the Tennessee Department of Correction is responsible for payment, as Thompson was sued in his official capacity.

Vaughn v. Trotter is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, M.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, M.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This memorandum by Chief Judge Morton addresses the determination of attorney fees in a case where defendant Vinson Thompson was found liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The court denied the defendant's request to delay the decision based on a proposed legislative amendment that ultimately failed. Furthermore, the court rejected the defendant's arguments to reduce fees due to alleged poor record-keeping, the plaintiff not prevailing against all defendants, or for a disproportionate relationship between fees and damages, citing established Sixth Circuit precedent, particularly Northcross v. Board of Education. The court awarded $9,084.00 in attorney fees to the plaintiff's attorney, Legal Services of Middle Tennessee, and determined that the Tennessee Department of Correction is responsible for payment, as Thompson was sued in his official capacity.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Vaughn v. Trotter workers compensation case in District Court, M.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Vaughn v. Trotter case law summary from District Court, M.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Vaughn v. Trotter Case Analysis

Vaughn v. Trotter is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, M.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.