CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Applicant's Petitions for Removal, finding that she failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board also denied a successive petition for removal, as the issues had already been decided. Furthermore, the Petition for Disqualification was denied for lacking specific factual allegations required to establish bias or prejudice on the part of the Workers' Compensation Judge.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Applicant's Petitions for Removal, finding that she failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board also denied a successive petition for removal, as the issues had already been decided. Furthermore, the Petition for Disqualification was denied for lacking specific factual allegations required to establish bias or prejudice on the part of the Workers' Compensation Judge.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.