CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a petition for removal and disqualification of the workers' compensation judge. The Board found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm required for removal, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, the petition for disqualification lacked specific factual allegations under penalty of perjury to support the claims of bias. Therefore, both aspects of the petition were denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a petition for removal and disqualification of the workers' compensation judge. The Board found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm required for removal, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, the petition for disqualification lacked specific factual allegations under penalty of perjury to support the claims of bias. Therefore, both aspects of the petition were denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.