Home/Case Law/Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCompensation Hearing Order

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon

Filed: May 02, 2019
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2018-06-0149

CompFox AI Summary

Kimberly Vickers filed a claim against Amazon after a workplace injury in December 2014. Amazon accepted the claim and provided treatment, with the last benefits provided on November 12, 2015. Vickers filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on January 29, 2018, arguing an earlier filing attempt on November 2, 2016, via email and mail to the ombudsman program. The Court, presided over by Judge Kenneth M. Switzer, determined that Vickers failed to provide sufficient proof that her earlier petition reached the Bureau and therefore did not timely file her claim within the one-year statute of limitations from the last benefit payment. Consequently, Amazon's Motion for Summary Judgment was granted, and Vickers' claim for workers' compensation benefits was dismissed with prejudice.

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Kimberly Vickers filed a claim against Amazon after a workplace injury in December 2014. Amazon accepted the claim and provided treatment, with the last benefits provided on November 12, 2015. Vickers filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on January 29, 2018, arguing an earlier filing attempt on November 2, 2016, via email and mail to the ombudsman program. The Court, presided over by Judge Kenneth M. Switzer, determined that Vickers failed to provide sufficient proof that her earlier petition reached the Bureau and therefore did not timely file her claim within the one-year statute of limitations from the last benefit payment. Consequently, Amazon's Motion for Summary Judgment was granted, and Vickers' claim for workers' compensation benefits was dismissed with prejudice.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon Case Analysis

Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.