CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant's petition for reconsideration of an administrative law judge's (WCJ) findings. The applicant sought to expand the compensable injury to include her right shoulder, neck, and left upper extremity, arguing the current findings were based on stale medical evidence. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's injury was limited to her right arm, elbow, and wrist, based on substantial medical evidence and res judicata. The Board also found that a minor error in identifying defense counsel in the findings and award did not constitute a due process violation.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant's petition for reconsideration of an administrative law judge's (WCJ) findings. The applicant sought to expand the compensable injury to include her right shoulder, neck, and left upper extremity, arguing the current findings were based on stale medical evidence. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's injury was limited to her right arm, elbow, and wrist, based on substantial medical evidence and res judicata. The Board also found that a minor error in identifying defense counsel in the findings and award did not constitute a due process violation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.