Home/Case Law/Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Regular Panel Decision DecisionOpinion

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Violanda Soledad sued Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company after it denied her uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) insurance claim. Soledad was injured as a passenger in a single-vehicle accident caused by a co-employee's negligence while both were in the course and scope of their employment. After receiving workers' compensation benefits, Soledad filed a claim for UM/UIM benefits under her personal policy, asserting damages exceeded the workers' compensation coverage. Texas Farm Bureau denied the claim, arguing that Soledad was not legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of the uninsured vehicle due to the exclusive-remedy provision of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Texas Farm Bureau, which the appellate court affirmed, concluding that Soledad was not legally entitled to recover from her employer or co-employee.

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Violanda Soledad sued Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company after it denied her uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) insurance claim. Soledad was injured as a passenger in a single-vehicle accident caused by a co-employee's negligence while both were in the course and scope of their employment. After receiving workers' compensation benefits, Soledad filed a claim for UM/UIM benefits under her personal policy, asserting damages exceeded the workers' compensation coverage. Texas Farm Bureau denied the claim, arguing that Soledad was not "legally entitled to recover" damages from the owner or operator of the uninsured vehicle due to the exclusive-remedy provision of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Texas Farm Bureau, which the appellate court affirmed, concluding that Soledad was not legally entitled to recover from her employer or co-employee.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company case law summary from Court of Appeals of Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company Case Analysis

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.