Home/Case Law/WALID THOMAS vs. KAZI FOODS, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

WALID THOMAS vs. KAZI FOODS, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS

Filed: Feb 22, 2008
San Francisco
POM 0290497

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Walid Thomas's petition for reconsideration of a decision that found his alleged back and hernia injuries sustained while employed by Kazi Foods were not industrial. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge, who found Dr. Hajj's opinion to be substantial medical evidence supporting this conclusion. The judge also found Thomas's testimony not credible due to his extensive prior medical history of similar back injuries and a hernia.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Walid Thomas's petition for reconsideration of a decision that found his alleged back and hernia injuries sustained while employed by Kazi Foods were not industrial. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge, who found Dr. Hajj's opinion to be substantial medical evidence supporting this conclusion. The judge also found Thomas's testimony not credible due to his extensive prior medical history of similar back injuries and a hernia.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

WALID THOMAS vs. KAZI FOODS, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox