CompFox AI Summary
The Applicant sought reconsideration of an award that apportioned his psychiatric permanent disability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the Agreed Medical Examiner's apportionment of psychiatric disability was not supported by substantial medical evidence. The Board ruled the Applicant was entitled to an unapportioned award for his psychiatric permanent disability. Consequently, the permanent disability award and attorney's fees were increased.
WAYNE MAVERICK vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Applicant sought reconsideration of an award that apportioned his psychiatric permanent disability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the Agreed Medical Examiner's apportionment of psychiatric disability was not supported by substantial medical evidence. The Board ruled the Applicant was entitled to an unapportioned award for his psychiatric permanent disability. Consequently, the permanent disability award and attorney's fees were increased.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.