Home/Case Law/XOCHITL BARAJAS vs. MAIDPRO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

XOCHITL BARAJAS vs. MAIDPRO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 16, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ3298878

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an applicant claiming industrial injury to multiple body parts while employed as a housekeeper on June 24, 2002. The defendant, SCIF, sought reconsideration, arguing the applicant was a co-employee of Maid Pro and Micro Source Management (MSM). The Board denied reconsideration, finding SCIF failed to meet its burden of proof to establish a dual employment relationship. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, adopting the WCJ's reasoning and directing the WCJ to schedule a status conference to address unresolved issues, including injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an applicant claiming industrial injury to multiple body parts while employed as a housekeeper on June 24, 2002. The defendant, SCIF, sought reconsideration, arguing the applicant was a co-employee of Maid Pro and Micro Source Management (MSM). The Board denied reconsideration, finding SCIF failed to meet its burden of proof to establish a dual employment relationship. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, adopting the WCJ's reasoning and directing the WCJ to schedule a status conference to address unresolved issues, including injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

XOCHITL BARAJAS vs. MAIDPRO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2015) – San Francisco | CompFox