Home/Case Law/YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Mar 02, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ6820900

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision, affirming penalties against the defendant for unpaid interest but amending the order regarding attorney's fees. The original order awarded penalties on unpaid interest and an attorney fee deducted from the applicant's award, which the applicant sought to increase. The Board found the WCJ's calculation of attorney's fees was unclear and deferred the issue of the fee amount for further proceedings. This return to the trial level is to allow for a proper calculation of the attorney's fee under Labor Code section 5814.5, based on time and effort expended.

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision, affirming penalties against the defendant for unpaid interest but amending the order regarding attorney's fees. The original order awarded penalties on unpaid interest and an attorney fee deducted from the applicant's award, which the applicant sought to increase. The Board found the WCJ's calculation of attorney's fees was unclear and deferred the issue of the fee amount for further proceedings. This return to the trial level is to allow for a proper calculation of the attorney's fee under Labor Code section 5814.5, based on time and effort expended.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

YVES GOLDSTICKER vs. PACIFIC COVE DEVELOPMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.