CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, affirming the finding of industrial injury to the applicant's left foot. The Board amended the original findings to explicitly include an industrial injury to the applicant's lower back, finding this issue was properly litigated by the parties. While the applicant's contentions regarding penalties and out-of-pocket expenses were noted, the Board directed those issues to be resolved informally or through further proceedings if necessary.
ZERITA JONES vs. ALBERTSONS, Permissibly Self-Insured, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, affirming the finding of industrial injury to the applicant's left foot. The Board amended the original findings to explicitly include an industrial injury to the applicant's lower back, finding this issue was properly litigated by the parties. While the applicant's contentions regarding penalties and out-of-pocket expenses were noted, the Board directed those issues to be resolved informally or through further proceedings if necessary.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.