CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ700106 (SAL 0075388) ADJ4293270 (SAL 0067937) ADJ3847224 (SAL 0067938) ADJ1646200 (SAL 0011386)
Regular
Sep 01, 2015

WILLIE PEARSON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Chamberlain's Children Center, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

In this workers' compensation case, CIGA sought to be relieved of liability for applicant's medical treatment, arguing that the State of California Department of Corrections ("the State") constituted "other insurance." The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the State does not qualify as "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)(A). Unlike private self-insured employers, the State is not required to obtain workers' compensation insurance or a certificate of self-insurance, and thus does not fall within the statutory definition of an "insurer." The Board further clarified that the State Compensation Insurance Fund's role in claim adjustment services for the State does not make it "other insurance" when the State is not otherwise insured with SCIF.

CIGASupernational Insurance Companylegally uninsuredother insurancecovered claimsInsurance Code Section 1063.1State of California Department of Correctionsreimbursementstipulated awardjoint and several liability
References
Case No. ADJ4684775 (VEN 0117727) ADJ4381820 (VEN 0117723)
Regular
Dec 19, 2011

JOANNE LUTZ, JOANN LUTZ vs. RUSSELL WARNER dba ROTO ROOTER SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, and for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, LINDA McDONALD, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior ruling, allowing CIGA to pursue reimbursement from State Farm for benefits paid due to applicant's industrial injuries. The Board found that unlike a request to alter a prior award, CIGA's petition sought to enforce its statutory right to reimbursement from "available" insurance under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9). Since State Farm, as a jointly and severally liable insurer, appears to be such "available" insurance, the case is remanded for further proceedings on CIGA's reimbursement claim.

California Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGAPaula Insurance CompanyFremont Insurance CompanyState Farm Insurance Companystipulated awardreconsiderationreimbursementcontributionother insurance
References
Case No. ADJ3816448 (LAO 0789900) ADJ335314 (LAO 0818843) ADJ1177078 (LAO 0789901)
Regular
Sep 25, 2015

RAYMUNDO PITONES vs. MEL CAST LITHO, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This case involves CIGA, the California Insurance Guarantee Association, seeking to be absolved of liability for workers' compensation benefits for an injured worker, Raymundo Pitones. CIGA argues that a settlement with another insurer for a subsequent, overlapping injury constitutes "other insurance" that should relieve CIGA of its obligations. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied CIGA's petition, finding that the subsequent settlement did not fully cover all of Pitones' injuries, particularly those that did not overlap. Therefore, CIGA remains liable for the benefits not covered by the prior settlement to ensure the applicant can recover his full benefits.

CIGACalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationMel Cast LithoInc.California Compensation Insurance CompanyliquidationSEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICESPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings of Fact and Orderworkers' compensation administrative law judge
References
Case No. ADJ937954 (POM 0254711)
Regular
Aug 18, 2010

ANGELITA (ANGIE) FERNANDEZ vs. OAK TREE RACING ASSOCIATION, LOS ANGELES TURF CLUB, CADDIE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, CIGA by its servicing agent CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES for LEGION INSURANCE, in liquidation, CRAWFORD & COMPANY on behalf of ZURICH INSURANCE

This case involved an applicant claiming industrial injury to her shoulders and upper extremities. A prior insurer, Legion Insurance, erroneously paid benefits through its administrator, REM, before its insolvency. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the arbitrator's decision, which held Zurich Insurance (adjusted by Crawford & Company) liable for reimbursement to CIGA. This is because Zurich provided "other insurance" for a portion of the cumulative trauma injury, making it solely responsible for benefits where both an insolvent and solvent insurer would be liable. The Board found CIGA could recover pre-insolvency and mistaken payments, and Zurich's due process claims were unpersuasive.

CIGAZurich InsuranceCrawford & CompanyOak Tree Racing AssociationLegion InsuranceFremont Indemnitycumulative traumainsolvent insurersolvent insurerreimbursement
References
Case No. GOL 86641, GOL 99800
Regular
Aug 07, 2008

MIGUEL TORRES vs. HENDRY TELEPHONE PRODUCTS, CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY/ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE INSURANCE, HR3 STAFFING SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to correct errors in the original award, specifically the misidentification of employers and their insurers. The WCAB rescinded the prior award and returned the case for further proceedings to determine the existence of a cumulative injury and clarify employer liability. The Board also noted that Connecticut Indemnity's policy likely constitutes "other insurance," thus precluding CIGA's involvement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoint Findings and AwardReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryNeckRight Upper ExtremityCarpal Tunnel SyndromeCubital Tunnel SyndromeHeadachesDizziness
References
Case No. GRO 0023124
Regular
Dec 31, 2007

CAROLINA CAMACHO vs. TEAMWORK, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, DEN-MAT, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

Zenith Insurance sought reconsideration of a WCAB decision that found CIGA not liable because other insurance was available, ordering Zenith to reimburse CIGA for benefits paid. Zenith argued the WCAB lacked jurisdiction, claiming the contribution issue was subject to mandatory arbitration under Labor Code § 5275. The WCAB denied reconsideration, ruling that § 5275 did not apply as this was a general/special employment situation, not a cumulative trauma case, and Zenith's insurance constituted "other insurance" relieving CIGA of liability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGAZenith Insurance CompanyContributionMandatory ArbitrationLabor Code Section 5275Labor Code Section 5500.5General EmploymentSpecial Employment
References
Case No. ADJ2480026
Regular
Aug 26, 2011

CHAD IMES vs. SCENARIO DESIGNS, INC., EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, POWER PAYROLL, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior ruling and ordered Everest National Insurance Company to reimburse CIGA for benefits paid to the applicant. The Board found that Everest was "other insurance" available under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9) because its insured, Scenario Designs, Inc., employed the applicant on the date of injury. This decision clarifies that reimbursement to CIGA does not alter the original award and aligns with statutory limitations on CIGA's liability. Everest is now obligated to reimburse CIGA and administer future benefits.

CIGAEverest National Insurance CompanyLegion Insurance CompanyScenario DesignsPower PayrollInc.other insurancereimbursementdate of injurygeneral-special employment
References
Case No. ANA 0366568
Regular
Aug 21, 2007

STACY MACK vs. CAREER STRATEGIES TEMP., INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, BROADSPIRE, SUN AMERICA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, TELEFLORA, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award, remanding the case to determine if the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) policy for Sun America constitutes "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9). This determination is crucial for assessing the liability of the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), which seeks to avoid coverage by arguing the SCIF policy is available. The WCAB requires further proceedings to fully develop the record regarding the intent and applicability of the SCIF policy for special employees.

CIGAcovered claimother insurancegeneral employerspecial employerSuperior National Insurance CompanyState Compensation Insurance FundInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)Insurance Code section 11663joint and several liability
References
Case No. SBR 309137
Regular
Aug 28, 2007

JOSE CARMONA vs. ARROW EMPLOYMENT SERVICES dba ARROW STAFFING SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, KELLY PRODUCTIONS, INC., FARMDALE CREAMERY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board is reconsidering a prior award due to CIGA's contention that the applicant's claim is not a "covered claim" because other insurance was available. The central issue is whether the special employer's (Farmdale Creamery) workers' compensation policy with SCIF constitutes "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9), which would exclude the claim from CIGA's coverage. The case is remanded for further proceedings to definitively determine the availability of this "other insurance" and its impact on CIGA's liability.

CIGALegion Insurance CompanyArrow Employment ServicesFarmdale CreameryState Compensation Insurance Fundcovered claimother insuranceInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)general employerspecial employer
References
Case No. ADJ4415679 (OAK 0259031) ADJ2701101 (WCK0050594)
Regular
May 10, 2010

Stanley Sanders vs. REMEDY INTELLIGENT STAFFING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC. dba NAPA PIPE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a judge's decision, ruling that Napa Pipe, a self-insured special employer, is liable for applicant Stanley Sanders' workers' compensation benefits. Despite an agreement between the general employer (Remedy Temp) and Napa Pipe attempting to limit liability to Remedy Temp's insurer (Reliance), Napa Pipe's joint and several liability as a special employer cannot be contractually eliminated. Because Napa Pipe's self-insurance was not excluded for special employees and constitutes "other insurance" under Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), CIGA is relieved of its obligation to provide benefits following Reliance's insolvency. Therefore, Napa Pipe must now provide all workers' compensation benefits and administer the claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardStanley SandersRemedy Intelligent StaffingCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationReliance National Insurance CompanyOregon Steel MillsNapa PipeADJ4415679ADJ2701101Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration
References
Showing 1-10 of 113 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational