CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

People v. Young

An attorney representing an indigent defendant in Monroe County filed an application seeking reimbursement for legal services at a rate of $200 per hour, mirroring the rate charged by the Special Prosecutor, rather than the statutory rates under County Law § 722-b. The attorney argued that the significant disparity in hourly compensation violated the defendant's right to equal protection and that his qualifications justified the requested rate. The New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers supported the application as amicus curiae, while Monroe County opposed it, arguing the request was untimely and lacked extraordinary circumstances. Presiding Judge Donald J. Mark, J., acknowledged the court's authority to grant compensation in excess of statutory limits under extraordinary circumstances but ultimately denied the application. The denial was based on the court's reasoning that an analogous argument was previously rejected, that linking assigned counsel rates to prosecutor rates would render County Law § 722-b ineffective, and that extraordinary circumstances could not be demonstrated prior to the conclusion of the criminal action. The court, however, reserved the right to reconsider an increased hourly fee upon the case's termination if such circumstances are then proven.

Assigned CounselLegal Aid CompensationCounty Law Section 722-bHourly Rate DisputeSpecial Prosecutor FeesIndigent RightsJudicial DiscretionExtraordinary CircumstancesMonroe County LawEqual Protection Challenge
References
16
Case No. ADJ13385386
Regular
Nov 17, 2020

ABRAHAM BERNAL vs. NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLC, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to amend the original decision regarding applicant Abraham Bernal's average weekly wage. The WCAB found the prior calculation of $\$1,383.39$ per week was erroneous as it diluted the applicant's earning capacity by using a lower hourly wage than his rate at the time of injury. The Board recalculated the average weekly wage based on actual hours worked, including overtime and holiday pay, at the applicant's established $\$27.00$ per hour rate. This resulted in an amended average weekly wage of $\$1,414.26$, increasing the temporary disability indemnity rate to $\$942.84$ per week.

ADJ13385386NIAGARA BOTTLING LLCSAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANYVan Nuys District OfficePETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONAVERAGE WEEKLY WAGESTEMPORARY DISABILITY INDEMNITYLABOR CODE § 4453(c)EARNING CAPACITYREGULAR WAGE
References
2
Case No. SAC 355328
Regular
Jul 12, 2007

COLLEEN JORDAN vs. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE

The Court of Appeal remanded this case for the Appeals Board to award attorney's fees to the applicant for responding to the defendant's petition for writ of review. The Appeals Board awarded $4,470.00 in attorney's fees, calculated at $300 per hour for 14.9 hours of work. This award reflects the attorney's experience, the complexity of the case, and the successful opposition to the writ.

Labor Code § 5801attorney's feesWrit of ReviewCourt of Appealsupplemental awardhourly rateworkers' compensation specialistappellate complexityreasonable attorney's feesWCAB
References
2
Case No. ADJ4094302 (AHM 0101287)
Regular
Jun 08, 2010

ROBERT STAMPS vs. KENNY-SHEA-TRAYLOR-FRONTIER-KEMPER JOINT VENTURE; AIG SERVICES, INC.

This case concerns a supplemental attorney's fee award for the applicant's attorney, John M. Urban, under Labor Code §5801. The Court of Appeal denied the defendant's petition for writ of review, finding no reasonable basis and remanding for attorney's fees. Applicant's attorney requested $5400.00 for 18 hours of work at $300 per hour, which the Board found reasonable. The Board awarded the requested amount to John M. Urban against the defendant joint venture.

ADJ4094302SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY'S FEESLABOR CODE §5801Court of Appeal Fourth Appellate Districtpetition for writ of reviewno reasonable basisremandattorney's feesapplicant's attorneyJohn M. Urban
References
1
Case No. ADJ7415342
Regular
Jul 01, 2013

Maggie Davis vs. Kern Medical Center, County of Kern

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of Kern's Petition for Reconsideration regarding an award of attorney's fees. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision to award applicant's attorney $770.00 based on 2.2 hours at $350.00 per hour for deposition representation. The Board found the defendant's arguments regarding the hourly rate, comparing it to physician and defense attorney rates, to be irrelevant and frivolous. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that applicant attorneys' fees are distinct from defense counsel's billing practices and established $350.00 per hour as reasonable for a Certified Workers' Compensation Specialist in the Bakersfield office.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code §5710Deposition Attorney's FeesHourly RateCertified SpecialistBakersfieldKern Medical CenterCounty of KernApplicant Attorney
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Bentvena v. City & Suburban

The claimant sustained a work-related injury in July 2003, leading to an issue raised by the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier regarding voluntary withdrawal from the labor market due to refusal of a light-duty assignment. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge initially found that the claimant voluntarily withdrew, but the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed this determination. On appeal by the employer and carrier, the court affirmed the Board's decision. The court found substantial evidence to support the Board's conclusion that the employer's proposed three eight-hour workdays were inconsistent with the claimant's medical limitations of five hours per day, not exceeding 25 hours per week, as indicated by the treating chiropractor.

Voluntary withdrawalLabor marketLight-duty assignmentWorkers' Compensation BoardMedical limitationsChiropractor testimonySubstantial evidenceAppellate reviewRefusal of workWork restrictions
References
4
Case No. FRE 0131884
Regular
May 28, 2008

CARMEN E. SOLLARS vs. TARGET STORES

The Court of Appeal remanded this case for additional attorney's fees for applicant's counsel after the defendant's petition for writ of review was denied. While applicant's counsel requested $8,640 based on 28.8 hours at $300/hour, the Appeals Board reduced the award. The Board found the requested rate and hours excessive, awarding $2,500 based on 10 hours at $250/hour, considering the result, work performed, and difficulty.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewAttorney's FeesLabor Code § 5801Court of AppealRemittiturSupplemental AwardAppellate WorkHourly RateReasonable Fees
References
1
Case No. ADJ1173648 (RDG 0088199) ADJ1460955 (RDG 0111795)
Regular
May 16, 2012

VANCE MARQUEZ vs. B&S AUTO & TRUCK, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY, PREFERRED EMPLOYERS SAN DIEGO, CLARENDON/AMERICAN ALL RISK LOSS FRESNO

This case concerns a remand from the Court of Appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) for attorney's fees. Applicant's counsel petitioned for $6,000 based on 20 hours at $300/hour, later revising the request to $400/hour due to his specialist certification and experience. The WCAB awarded $7,600, based on 19 hours at $400/hour, considering the complexity of the defendant's petition and the attorney's expertise. This award is against California Indemnity for services rendered in responding to the defendant's petition for writ of review.

Attorney FeesLabor Code section 5801Petition for Writ of ReviewAppeals BoardCertified Workers' Compensation SpecialistHourly RateSacramento County Bar AssociationAppellate WorkNovel IssuesLegislative Intent
References
1
Case No. ADJ1036181 (LAO 0861182), ADJ1313689 (LAO 0861180), ADJ3257740 (LAO 0861181)
Regular
Jun 23, 2014

RONNIE C. EDGE vs. WORLD CITRUS WEST, NATIONWIDE INSURANCE

This case concerns a defendant's challenge to a WCJ's award of 12 additional hours of home health care. The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision, finding the defendant's argument regarding the timing of the award was not substantiated by the medical evidence. The Board substituted a new award granting four hours per day, three days per week of home health care for three months following the applicant's left knee surgery, as recommended by Dr. Sobol. The Board affirmed the finding of untimely utilization review and other awarded treatments.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardUtilization ReviewJoint Findings of FactHome Health CareMedical TreatmentLeft Knee SurgerySubstantial EvidenceDr. SobolPulmonary Function TestingBiPAP Machine
References
1
Case No. ADJ9664433
Regular
Jan 27, 2020

DANA GRACE vs. PANINO SANTA YNEZ, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a workers' compensation claim for permanent total disability due to an industrial injury sustained by Dana Grace as a server. Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of the initial finding regarding applicant's average weekly earnings. The Board granted both petitions, amending the decision to establish applicant's average weekly wage at $553.50, based on a 40-hour workweek at $11.50 per hour plus a meal allowance. This revised wage establishes a permanent total disability indemnity rate of $369.00 per week, before cost of living adjustments.

Average Weekly EarningsEarning CapacityPermanent Total DisabilityReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardIndustrial InjuryWCJPetitions for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 4659(c)Evidence Code Section 1401(a)
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 1,315 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational