CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1462284
Regular
Dec 09, 2013

ESEQUIEL TREVISO vs. VISTA VALENCIA GOLF COURSE aka AMERICAN GOLF; CIGA; SEDGWICK CMS for LEGION INSURANCE, in liquidation

This case involves a Petition for Reconsideration filed with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB dismissed the petition because the petitioner was not an aggrieved party and the petition was not properly verified. The dismissal is based on California Labor Code sections 5900, 5903, and 5902.

Petition for ReconsiderationAggrievedUnverifiedDismissalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLab. CodeAdministrative Law JudgeReport and RecommendationLiquidationCIGA
References
0
Case No. ADJ3811253 (SJO 0222549)
Regular
Oct 11, 2010

MINH LUU vs. STUDENT WORKS PAINTING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

This case concerns a petition for reconsideration that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has dismissed. The dismissal is based on the petition being untimely filed. California Labor Code section 5903 and related rules establish strict deadlines for filing such petitions, which are jurisdictional. As the petition was filed significantly after the statutory time limit for reconsideration had expired, the WCAB lacked the authority to consider it.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimelyDismissedLabor Code Section 5903JurisdictionalWCJ's DecisionService DateMailing ExtensionWCAB Rule 10507Valle v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
References
6
Case No. ADJ8033206
Regular
Sep 16, 2013

HUMBERTO ROMO vs. HUNTER LANDSCAPE, INC., CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Humberto Romo's Petition for Reconsideration. The dismissal was based on two procedural defects: the petition was not verified as required by Labor Code section 5902, and it failed to state statutory grounds under Labor Code section 5903. Even if the petition had been properly verified, the WCAB would have denied it on the merits, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissedVerifiedLabor Code section 5902Statutory GroundsLabor Code section 5903WCJ ReportAdopt and IncorporateDeny on the MeritsWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
2
Case No. ADJ2725399 (VNO 0431180) ADJ832058 (VNO 0431183)
Regular
Oct 07, 2011

JUDITH VOLKERTS vs. JON B. ARTZ, CIGA by its servicing facility, BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES for CALIFORNIA COMP. INSURANCE, in liquidation, SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Findings and Award were personally served on the applicant on June 28, 2011. Labor Code section 5903 dictates a 20-day filing window for reconsideration petitions after service, a jurisdictional deadline. Since the petition was filed on August 17, 2011, it exceeded this statutory timeframe.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingLabor Code Section 5903Jurisdictional Time LimitFindings and AwardPersonal ServiceWCJ DecisionDismissal OrderCIGA
References
0
Case No. VNO 0454707
Regular
Aug 23, 2007

JOSE FRANCO vs. FURNITURE RESOURCES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Jose Franco's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. Labor Code section 5903 establishes a strict 20-day filing deadline, extendable by 5 days for mailing, for petitions for reconsideration. This case was dismissed because the petition was filed over 25 days after the Workers' Compensation Judge's decision was served, rendering the filing jurisdictionally defective.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationTimelinessLabor Code Section 5903jurisdictionaldismissal20-day limit5-day mailing extensiondeemed filedactual receipt
References
6
Case No. SFO 406432
Regular
Apr 09, 2008

VANCOIS D'AMOUN vs. PACIUFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed untimely. The petition failed to meet the 20-day statutory deadline under Labor Code § 5903, plus the additional 5 days for mailing under Code of Civil Procedure §1013, and was not filed in the correct office. Consequently, the WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report and ordered the petition dismissed.

Petition for ReconsiderationWCAB Rule 10840Lab. Code §5903Code of Civil Procedure §1013untimelydismissReport and Recommendationadministrative law judgeworkers' compensationapplicant
References
0
Case No. ADJ2344107
Regular
Jun 23, 2014

RODRIGO ROJAS vs. ATTAI NDA MESSOU

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The petitioner had actual notice of the Order Approving Compromise and Release by January 22, 2014, and the petition was not filed until April 28, 2014. Labor Code section 5903 mandates a 20-day filing window for such petitions, and exceeding this limit is a jurisdictional defect. Therefore, the Board lacked the authority to grant the petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingLabor Code Section 5903Actual NoticeOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseJurisdictional Time LimitAppeals BoardWCJ Report and RecommendationSupplemental LetterDismissed Petition
References
7
Case No. ADJ4294874 (LAO 0856588)
Regular
Nov 30, 2015

MARIA ARIAS vs. SUPERBRA, INC., CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Maria Arias's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found that the petition sought reconsideration of a non-final order, which is not permissible under Labor Code sections 5900(a), 5902, and 5903. A final order must determine a substantive right/liability or a threshold issue, and the WCJ's decision here addressed only an intermediate procedural or evidentiary matter. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as improper.

Petition for ReconsiderationNon-final OrderWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ ReportSubstantive RightLiabilityThreshold IssueInterlocutory ProceduralEvidentiary DecisionsInterim Orders
References
4
Case No. ADJ7854389
Regular
Nov 26, 2012

TROY SANDERS vs. LOWE'S HIW, INC., SEDGWICK CMS

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision dismisses the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The petition was filed more than 25 days after the August 1, 2012 Order Approving Compromise and Release. Specifically, it failed to meet the 20-day deadline under Labor Code section 5903, plus 5 days for mailing. Even if timely, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationReport and Recommendationtimely-fileduntimelydismissOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseLabor Code section 5903Code of Civil Procedure section 1013administrative law judge
References
0
Case No. ADJ4158118
Regular
Nov 06, 2012

JUAN GONZALEZ vs. VALLEY HEAT TREATING, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

This case concerns a petition for reconsideration filed by Juan Gonzalez. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was untimely. Labor Code section 5903 provides a 20-day filing window, which is not extended by mail when personal service occurs. Since the petition was filed after this jurisdictional deadline, the Board lacked the power to grant it. Additionally, the Board indicated the petition would have been denied on its merits had it been timely filed.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingLabor Code Section 5903Personal ServicejurisdictionalDismissalWCJ's ReportReport and RecommendationWrit Denied
References
7
Showing 1-10 of 35 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational