CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. SAC 0315585
Regular
Sep 18, 2007

Bradley Dorigo vs. State of California, Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund

This case concerns the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIF) liability for an applicant's vocational rehabilitation counselor fees. The Appeals Board affirmed a prior award requiring SIF to reimburse a portion of the vocational expert's fees, despite SIF's arguments that it was not liable for such costs. The Board cited prior writ-denied cases and relevant statutes, including Code of Civil Procedure section 1028 and Labor Code section 5708, to support its decision.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundVocational rehabilitation expertLabor Code section 4751Compromise and releaseStipulated awardPermanent disabilityReimbursementWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative law judgeCode of Civil Procedure section 1028
References
Case No. ADJ6843759; ADJ6937004
Regular
Feb 04, 2013

CHARLES HOLZ vs. GOTTCHALKS; SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES

The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the prior order denying their motion. This decision allows the defendant to compel the applicant to attend an evaluation with their vocational expert, despite no explicit statutory authority for such an order. The Board found this was necessary under Labor Code section 5708 to ascertain the substantial rights of the parties, especially since the applicant had already utilized his own vocational expert. The Board distinguished this case from *Browne v. Superior Court*, noting the current case does not involve a physical examination.

Petition for RemovalVocational ExpertDiminished Future Earnings CapacityDFECAgreed Medical EvaluatorWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code Section 5708WCJInterlocutory OrdersRebuttal
References
Case No. ADJ3847846 (SDO 0345131)
Regular
Apr 24, 2009

Michelle Camp vs. San Diego Rural Fire Protection District

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision regarding applicant Michelle Camp's temporary disability benefits and attorney's fees. The Board rescinded the original decision due to procedural errors, specifically the lack of a proper record including issues and stipulations, and the reliance on unverified letters as petitions. The case is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings, a corrected record, and a new decision. This action ensures all procedural requirements are met before a final determination is made.

Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardvolunteer firefightertemporary disability indemnityattorney's feepetition for reconsiderationproper recordissues and stipulationsMinutes of Hearing Summary of Evidenceunverified letterLab. Code
References
Case No. ADJ8647584
Regular
Jun 07, 2017

Antonio Vargas vs. Darrell Becker, Becker Construction, Ace Private Risk Services, ESIS, Miguel Quintero

The Appeals Board affirmed a WCJ's finding that Antonio Vargas sustained industrial injury to his bilateral wrists while employed as a painter/helper. The Board found no error in admitting Vargas's remote testimony via FaceTime from Mexico, considering his deportation established his unavailability. Testimony from Aida Higuera, mother of Vargas's children, was also deemed admissible to confirm his identity, as the need arose after the pre-trial conference. However, the issue of injury to other body parts was deferred for further proceedings due to insufficient evidence.

Remote TestimonyFaceTimeDue ProcessEvidence Code 240Labor Code 5502(d)(3)Pretrial Conference StatementUnavailabilityPerjuryFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureLabor Code 5710
References
Case No. ADJ4599548 (MON 0212034) ADJ1776170 (MON 0224335) ADJ1414058 (MON 0246016)
Regular
Feb 16, 2017

KRISTIAN VON RITZHOFF vs. OGDEN ENTERTAINMENT FOOD SERVICES, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., BROADSPIRE

This case involves applicant Kristian Von Ritzhoff's workers' compensation claim. After a Court of Appeal decision annulled prior board decisions, the case returned for further proceedings, but discovery stalled due to disputes over depositions. The Appeals Board, on its own motion, granted removal due to the impracticality of appointing a Special Master. Consequently, the Board has transferred the proceedings to WCJ David Pollak to oversee and complete the depositions of the applicant's former spouse and Dr. Gilberg, as required by the Court of Appeal.

RemovalSpecial MasterDiscovery DisputeDepositionDana KasovaDr. GilbergApportionmentCourt of AppealRemittiturWCJ David Pollak
References
Case No. ADJ9910760
Regular
Nov 20, 2018

RAFAEL GUZMAN RODRIGUEZ vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT COLLECTION AND RECYCLING, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB affirmed its prior decision allowing the applicant to audio record a qualified medical evaluation with Dr. Dizay. The Board exercised its broad discretion to guide discovery, amending the initial administrative law judge's order which had prohibited recording. This decision aligns with the WCAB's authority to review and modify WCJ decisions based on the existing record and judicial discretion.

Petition for ReconsiderationAudio RecordingQualified Medical EvaluatorPanel QMEWCAB DiscretionLabor Code Section 5708Code of Civil ProcedureWCJ DecisionReconsideration ProceedingsJudicial Discretion
References
Case No. ADJ 4103043 (VNO 0476350) ADJ 3126939 (VNO 0476351) ADJ 2605301 (VNO 0476352)
Regular
Jan 05, 2011

JOHN ALLEN PERRY vs. THE KROGER CO. DBA FOOD 4 LESS, PSI, ADMINISTERED BY SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that surgery was "probably" required based on the Agreed Medical Evaluator's deposition testimony. The Board found that the defendant waived any objection to the applicant's evidence by failing to offer potentially contradictory reports in rebuttal at trial. Furthermore, the Board noted that it is not bound by common law evidence rules and hearsay is admissible.

Agreed Medical EvaluatorMandatory Settlement ConferencePetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJRebuttalInvited ErrorHearsay AdmissibleLabor Code Sections 57085709
References
Case No. ADJ8603938
Regular
Sep 18, 2015

MACARIO IGLESIAS vs. ABE EL PRODUCE, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's exclusion of their exhibits. The exhibits were deemed untimely filed as they were received by the Board less than 20 days before trial, contrary to a pre-trial order. The Board confirmed that the relevant Appeals Board rule regarding filing dates had not been repealed and that the lien claimant failed to meet their burden of proof. A dissenting opinion argued the pre-trial order was potentially ambiguous and that the exhibits should have been admitted given timely service and no prejudice to the defendant.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderWorkers' Compensation Appeals Judge (WCJ)ExhibitsTimely filedRepealed ruleRule 10392Pre-trial conference
References
Case No. ADJ9664433
Regular
Jan 27, 2020

DANA GRACE vs. PANINO SANTA YNEZ, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a workers' compensation claim for permanent total disability due to an industrial injury sustained by Dana Grace as a server. Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of the initial finding regarding applicant's average weekly earnings. The Board granted both petitions, amending the decision to establish applicant's average weekly wage at $553.50, based on a 40-hour workweek at $11.50 per hour plus a meal allowance. This revised wage establishes a permanent total disability indemnity rate of $369.00 per week, before cost of living adjustments.

Average Weekly EarningsEarning CapacityPermanent Total DisabilityReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardIndustrial InjuryWCJPetitions for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 4659(c)Evidence Code Section 1401(a)
References
Showing 1-10 of 18 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational