CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ 7906635, ADJ 7906741
Regular
May 02, 2016

LINDA ARMS vs. COUNTY OF KERN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of Kern's petition for reconsideration. The County sought to overturn an award regarding the reasonable cost of two medical-legal reports from Dr. Ali Mostafavi. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge, who found the attested hours and resulting fee schedule calculations for the reports to be reasonable. The County failed to demonstrate that the time spent by Dr. Mostafavi on the reports was unreasonable.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCounty of KernLinda ArmsADJ 7906635ADJ 7906741Workers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeFindings Orders and AwardQualified Medical ExaminerQME
References
Case No. ADJ 1050422, ADJ 3107039, SAL 104052, SAL 114548
Regular
Sep 08, 2008

ESTELA LUIS vs. COMMUNITY BRIDGES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The WCAB granted reconsideration of a WCJ's decision awarding 100% permanent disability, finding the medical record inadequate to justify the WCJ's determination on cumulative trauma and apportionment. The matter is returned for further development of the medical record and a new decision.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardEstela LuisCommunity BridgesState Compensation Insurance FundADJ 1050422ADJ 3107039SAL 104052SAL 114548Permanent Disability Rating ScheduleApportionment
References
Case No. ADJ3283274 (VNO 0386537) ADJ4545965 (VNO 0386536) ADJ3421140 (VNO 0347301)
Regular
Jan 25, 2010

BARBARA STRAUSS vs. WEST MARINE, INC., CIGA for RELIANCE in liquidation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the caption of a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying reconsideration. The error involved the incorrect assignment of ADJ and VNO numbers to the relevant case numbers. The WCAB is correcting this error to accurately reflect the case numbers as ADJ3283274 and VNO 0386537. This correction ensures proper record-keeping for applicant Barbara Strauss and defendants West Marine, Inc., et al.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorCorrected Case NumberADJ NumberVNO NumberReversal of NumbersLiquidation
References
Case No. ADJ3578461 (LAO 0850267) ADJ2673172 (LAO 0850268)
Regular
Jun 19, 2014

LUIS GARCIA vs. REGENT MANUFACTURING, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's prior Order Approving Compromise and Release and Award. The Board rescinded that decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings. This action does not constitute a final decision on the merits, and parties retain the right to seek further reconsideration.

WCABReconsiderationGrant ReconsiderationRescind DecisionFurther ProceedingsCompromise and ReleaseAwardAdministrative Law JudgeTrial LevelApplicant
References
Case No. ADJ9835949; ADJ9835948; ADJ9860843
Regular
Sep 29, 2025

EDGAR ARAGON-ZARATE vs. MODERN AUTO CENTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Lien claimant Joyce Altman Interpreting sought reconsideration of a Joint Findings and Order issued by a WCJ, which dismissed their lien for interpreting services due to alleged false or inaccurate information in their declaration under Labor Code section 4903.05(c). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the F&O, noting ambiguity in the record regarding whether the defendant denied all liability at the time the interpreting services were rendered. The WCAB emphasized that interpreting services are an integral part of medical treatment and returned the matter for further proceedings to develop the record.

Labor Code section 4903.05(c)Lien claimant declarationInterpreting services lienMedical treatment expensesDeclaration accuracyDue processExcusable neglectRescind OrderReturn to trial levelWCAB
References
Case No. ADJ3239585 (FRE 0221296) ADJ4067986 (FRE 0234030) ADJ6864975
Regular
Jul 15, 2014

DIANE C. MORENO vs. PPG INDUSTRIES

Applicant Diane C. Moreno petitioned for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The Board granted the petition to allow further study of the factual and legal issues. This action is necessary for a complete understanding and a just decision. All future filings must be submitted in writing directly to the Commissioners' office, not local district offices or e-filed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationGranting PetitionFurther ProceedingsElectronic Adjudication Management SystemWCABADJFREYork Risk ServicesPPG Industries
References
Case No. ADJ7836843, ADJ8319146, ADJ8319196, ADJ8319319
Regular
Jul 15, 2025

JOSE VAZQUEZ vs. VALLEJO MINI MARKET AND GAS STATIONS INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Applicant Jose Vazquez timely petitioned for reconsideration of the Findings and Order issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge on November 19, 2024. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to study the factual and legal issues. Following a commissioners' settlement conference, the parties filed an executed compromise and release and a proposed order on June 26, 2025. To expedite review and approval, the Board rescinded the November 19, 2024 Findings and Order and remanded the matter to the WCJ to consider the compromise and release and proposed order, with further proceedings as deemed appropriate.

ADJFindings and OrderReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseProposed OrderRescindRemandWCJCommissionerWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
Case No. ADJ1246006 (VNO 0554055)
Regular
Nov 13, 2012

ANA CARRANZA vs. PALACE HOLDINGS, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by a lien claimant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the Findings of Fact and Order were issued. Even if timely, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration is dismissed.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissalUntimely FilingWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ ReportLabor Code Section 5903Code of Civil Procedure Section 1013Lien ClaimantFindings of Fact and OrderAdministrative Law Judge
References
Case No. ADJ8724064, ADJ8724067
Regular
May 13, 2016

LISA BOSTROM vs. PIER 1 IMPORTS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has dismissed Lisa Bostrom's Petition for Removal. This dismissal is a direct result of the petitioner withdrawing their request for removal of the March 28, 2016 decision. Consequently, no further appeals or review of that decision will proceed.

Petition for RemovalDismissedWithdrawnWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJApplicantDefendantMaria Del Rey District OfficeOrder DismissingSan Francisco
References
Case No. ADJ4704159 (AHM 0120563) ADJ2217428 (AHM 0106492) ADJ2380068 (AHM 0102888)
Regular
Feb 07, 2011

ROSALIE SEE vs. REMAX REAL ESTATE, BENEFICIAL SERVICES; EMPLOYERS COMP GLENDALE

The applicant sought to remove a WCJ's order compelling a medical evaluation. Applicant argued a prior agreed medical evaluation with a defendant-approved evaluator should suffice, preventing a second evaluation. The Appeals Board denied removal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, and reconsideration will be adequate if necessary.

Petition for RemovalJoint Order Compelling AttendanceMedical EvaluationAgreed Medical Evaluator (AME)Highland Insurance CompanyExtraordinary RemedySubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmReconsiderationWCJ
References
Showing 1-10 of 49 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational