CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ 3758765 (LBO 0335564) ADJ 977794 (LBO 0350733)
Regular
Jun 24, 2009

ROBERT BOUQUET, vs. FARBOTECH COLOR INCORPORATED, et al., INK SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration for CIGA (ADJ 3758765) and National Fire Insurance (ADJ 977794) due to errors in the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decisions. In ADJ 3758765, the WCJ's decision improperly included Legion Insurance and omitted necessary caption corrections, necessitating a new decision. In ADJ 977794, the WCJ failed to rule on National's credit claim, erroneously calculated applicant's earnings, and required caption adjustments. Both cases are returned to the trial level for further proceedings and revised decisions by the WCJ.

CIGAFremont IndemnityNational Fire Insurance CompanyFarbotech ColorInk Systemspetition for reconsiderationFindings and AwardWCJpermanent disabilitytemporary total disability
References
3
Case No. ADJ-4279077 (SDO 0317244)
Regular
Jun 09, 2016

TINA BARONI vs. CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued a Decision After Removal ordering the striking of three sets of documents from the EAMS record. These documents pertained to San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2016-00006537-CU-IC-CTL and were submitted without objection. The WCAB previously issued a Notice of Intention to Strike these documents, stating they would be removed unless good cause to the contrary was shown. No objections were received from the parties or the identified attorneys.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalStriking DocumentsEAMS recordCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationReliance National Indemnity CompanyLiquidationSan Diego Superior CourtObjectionGood Cause
References
1
Case No. ADJ 4380925 [SAC 360366] ADJ 1181280 [SAC 363258]
Regular
Sep 02, 2008

DIEGO JIMENEZ, DIEGO JIMENEZ-BROCA vs. WESTERN ROOFING SYSTEMS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Reconsideration granted; June 6, 2008 Findings of Fact affirmed except for clerical error correction in case number.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactIndustrial InjuryRooferTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityFurther Medical CareQualified Medical ExaminerSubstantial Evidence
References
6
Case No. ADJ 244571, ADJ 3315572, ADJ 3817980, ADJ 2004405, ADJ 4239471
Regular
Aug 29, 2008

DIANA HARDMAN vs. COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, FREMONT COMPENSATION COMPANY

The WCAB granted reconsideration of the WCJ's June 16, 2008 decision. The decision is rescinded, and the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardsPermanent and StationaryPermanent DisabilityApportionmentFurther Medical TreatmentCalifornia Insurance Guarantee AssociationCIGALiquidation
References
3
Case No. ADJ3283274 (VNO 0386537) ADJ4545965 (VNO 0386536) ADJ3421140 (VNO 0347301)
Regular
Jan 25, 2010

BARBARA STRAUSS vs. WEST MARINE, INC., CIGA for RELIANCE in liquidation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the caption of a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying reconsideration. The error involved the incorrect assignment of ADJ and VNO numbers to the relevant case numbers. The WCAB is correcting this error to accurately reflect the case numbers as ADJ3283274 and VNO 0386537. This correction ensures proper record-keeping for applicant Barbara Strauss and defendants West Marine, Inc., et al.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorCorrected Case NumberADJ NumberVNO NumberReversal of NumbersLiquidation
References
0
Case No. ADJ 6989600 ADJ 7517232 ADJ 7597741 ADJ 9169430
Regular
May 02, 2016

RENE MENDOZA (Deceased) DOLORES MENDOZA (Dependent) vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AUTHORITY; YORK

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involves a petition for removal filed by a petitioner, who subsequently withdrew it. As a result, the Board ordered the dismissal of the petition. The case originates from the claims of Dolores Mendoza, dependent of the deceased Rene Mendoza, against the City of Los Angeles Department of Housing Authority and York. This dismissal pertains to a decision issued on March 16, 2016.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDismissedApplicantDependentDefendantCase Nos.Van Nuys District OfficeDecisionPetitioner
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 01, 1992

Seelig v. Sielaff

The Supreme Court, New York County, initially issued a judgment enjoining respondents from releasing the social security numbers of correction officers without their consent and ordered the implementation of privacy safeguards. This judgment was subsequently reversed on appeal, vacated, and the proceeding was converted to one for a declaratory judgment. The appellate court declared that the release of correction officers' social security numbers by the respondents, in response to a Public Officers Law § 87 request, constituted an unwarranted invasion of privacy under Public Officers Law § 89 (2), citing federal precedents. The injunctive relief previously granted was also deemed improper as the Personal Privacy Protection Law (Public Officers Law § 92 [1]) exempts local government units and the judiciary from its provisions.

Freedom of Information LawPrivacy InvasionSocial Security NumbersCorrection OfficersPublic Officers LawDeclaratory JudgmentAppellate ReviewGovernment RecordsConfidentialityCPLR Article 78
References
9
Case No. ADJ 9547788, ADJ 9771745, ADJ 9805683
Regular
Mar 24, 2016

MARTIN TORTOLEDO vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Martin Tortoledo. The dismissal was based on the petitioner's failure to comply with WCAB Rule 10842(b), which requires specific citations to the record to support evidentiary statements. The WCAB emphasized that this rule mirrors appellate court requirements and that litigants cannot shift the burden of searching the record to the Board. Had the petition not been dismissed procedurally, the WCAB would have denied it on the merits as per the WCJ's report.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportWCAB Rule 10842(b)specific references to the recordappellate proceedingswaiver of pointburden of discoveryADM_CASE_NO_ADJ9547788ADM_CASE_NO_ADJ9771745
References
6
Case No. ADJ 4305364 [FRE 020 5853] ADJ 1996561 [FRE 0222582] ADJ 3702453 [FRE 0222581] ADJ 252766 [FRE 0235563]
Regular
Sep 02, 2008

AURORA CHAVEZ vs. SELMA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The petition for reconsideration is denied because lien claimant did not show good cause for its failure to appear at the MSC as allowed by the WCJ.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantReconsiderationDismissal with PrejudiceMandatory Settlement ConferenceNotice of Intent to DismissGood CauseDue ProcessOfficial Address RecordProof of Service
References
3
Case No. ADJ 4121660 ADJ 4115607
Regular
Sep 05, 2008

Kevin Dickinsen vs. ARAI DESIGN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the WCJ’s decision to reflect apportionment of 25% to nonindustrial factors, affirming the rest of the decision. Apportionment was based on Dr. Miles' opinion and compliance with legal standards.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardFindings and AwardReconsiderationPermanent DisabilityApportionmentIndustrial InjuryCumulative TraumaState Compensation Insurance FundAgreed Medical ExaminerAMA Guides
References
6
Showing 1-10 of 426 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational