CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3706205
Regular
Sep 12, 2008

ANGELA FAN vs. GAMING FUND GROUP, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of a Findings and Award regarding industrial injury. The WCJ's decision was affirmed with amendments clarifying the period of delayed permanent disability and defendant's credit.

ANGELA FANGAMING FUND GROUPSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDADJ3706205SJO 0245496OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONGRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATIONFUNDED CARD PLAYERPERMANENT DISABILITY
References
Case No. ADJ136720 (OXN 0147205)
Regular
Apr 24, 2009

ANGELA SMITH vs. WILSON ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, AIG COSTA MESA

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by Angela Smith. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has reviewed the petition and the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. For the reasons stated in the judge's report, the Board has denied Ms. Smith's petition. Therefore, the prior decision remains in effect.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportdeny reconsiderationADJ136720ADJ403529Wilson Administrative ServicesAIG Costa MesaAngela SmithJames C. Cuneo
References
Case No. ADJ8128282
Regular
Jan 23, 2014

ANGELA EGBIKUADJE vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior award, returning the case for further proceedings. The defendant, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, argued that the applicant's psychiatric injury claim was preempted by the ADA and not proven under Labor Code section 3208.3. The Board found the original decision lacked proper analysis regarding predominant industrial causation and the good faith personnel action defense. Therefore, the case was remanded for further development of the record, including expert medical opinion on these issues.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAngela EgbikuadjeCalifornia Department of Corrections and RehabilitationLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundADJ8128282Van Nuys District OfficeReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial cumulative trauma injury
References
Case No. ADJ11098848
Regular
Nov 02, 2019

WENYUAN FAN vs. YAYA LOVE, INC., dba OH BABY SUSHI, TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST, INC.

This case involves a dispute over a $10,000 penalty awarded for an employer's unreasonable delay in paying temporary disability benefits. The employer sought reconsideration, arguing no penalty petition was filed and the WCJ exceeded authority by holding an expedited hearing solely on the penalty. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and returned the case to the trial level. This action was taken due to an absence of evidence supporting the penalty, particularly regarding the timing of the employer's knowledge of the underpayment and their reasonableness.

Wenyuan FanYaya LoveInc.Oh Baby SushiTechnology Insurance CompanyAmtrustInc.ADJ11098848San Jose District OfficePetition for Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ9620902
Regular
Apr 05, 2019

ANGELA OLIVER vs. ROSS STORES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Angela Oliver's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final order addressing only discovery issues. The WCAB also denied Oliver's Petition for Removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denial, nor that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Removal is an extraordinary remedy rarely granted by the Board. Therefore, the petitions seeking interlocutory review were dismissed and denied.

Petition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalFinal OrderInterlocutory DecisionSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmExtraordinary RemedyWCJ DecisionDiscovery IssuesThreshold Issue
References
Case No. ADJ6821677
Regular
Sep 13, 2012

ANGELA GJERTSEN vs. VONS COMPANIES, INC.

This case involves Angela Gjertsen's petition for removal, which the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied. The petition, filed by Gjertsen's attorneys, sought reconsideration of an order taking a lien conference off calendar and requiring a supplemental AME report. The WCJ recommended denial because the petition lacked verification and proof of service, and the applicant failed to demonstrate she was aggrieved or irreparably harmed by the order. The WCJ noted that the order directed the defendant and lien claimant, not the applicant, to obtain the supplemental report.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJAME reportlien conferenceJudge Pro Temporesubstantial medical evidenceCompromise and ReleaseNotice and Request for Allowance of LienSandhagen
References
Case No. ADJ6637625
Regular
Dec 20, 2019

ANGELA WILLIAMS vs. CLOVIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, CORVEL CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Clovis Community Hospital's petition for reconsideration of a permanent total disability award for Angela Williams. The Board affirmed the finding that Ms. Williams is permanently and totally disabled due to an industrial injury as a registered nurse, deeming vocational evidence that she is not amenable to rehabilitation and precluded from the labor market to be persuasive. The Board also found that a subsequent motor vehicle accident, occurring while Ms. Williams was traveling from a medical appointment for her industrial injury, was a compensable consequence, and no evidence suggested material deviation from the route. Therefore, defendant's arguments regarding medical ratings and apportionment were rejected, and the original award was upheld.

Permanent total disabilityvocational evidencescheduled permanent disability ratingAgreed Medical Examinermotor vehicle accidentapportionmentcompensable consequencematerial deviationLabor Code section 4660Labor Code section 4663
References
Case No. ADJ6668545
Regular
Dec 05, 2014

ANGELA SALAZAR vs. PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, ZURICH, GALLAGHER BASSETT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Applicant Angela Salazar's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the Judge's report, which found that while Salazar was a credible witness, the medical evidence did not constitute substantial evidence to support an industrial injury. The Judge determined that medical reports lacked critical details like work hours and failed to adequately explain causation. Furthermore, Salazar's own testimony and her post-injury success in education and employment supported the finding of no compensable industrial injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ ReportMedical EvidenceSubstantial EvidenceCumulative TraumaAOE/COECredibilityLiberal ConstructionLabor Code
References
Case No. ADJ10201509
Regular
Aug 28, 2019

ANGELA GARCIA vs. MANI BROTHERS NINE THOUSAND DE, LLC

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a Petition for Reconsideration filed by lien claimant Qualified Billing and Collections, LLC, in the case of Angela Garcia v. Mani Brothers Nine Thousand DE, LLC. The Board adopted the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge, finding no evidence of fraud by the defendant concerning a deposition. Additionally, the Board admonished the lien claimant's representative for attaching inadmissible exhibits to their petition, warning of future sanctions for non-compliance with Board rules. Consequently, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ reportlien claimantfrauddepositionIlona KulikovaQualified Billing and CollectionsLLCAppeals Board Rule 10842(c)
References
Case No. ADJ651477 (VNO 0522310)
Regular
Jun 24, 2010

ANGELA MORENO vs. CITY OF GLENDALE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted petitions for reconsideration filed by both the applicant and the defendant. This action was taken due to statutory time constraints and an initial review of the record indicating a need for further study of the factual and legal issues. The Board requires additional time to thoroughly understand the record and issue a just decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCity of GlendalePermissibly Self-InsuredStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual IssuesLegal IssuesDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersFrank M. Brass
References
Showing 1-10 of 33 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational