CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3533713
Regular
Nov 07, 2011

JUANA LOPEZ vs. THE MERCHANT OF TENNIS, HARTFORD INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) removed this matter for the purpose of imposing sanctions. The WCAB found that the petition for reconsideration filed by SIR Practice Solutions, LLC on behalf of several lien claimants was skeletal, unintelligible, and violated multiple WCAB rules regarding evidentiary and legal support. The lien claimants and SIR Practice Solutions, LLC failed to object to the Notice of Intention to Impose Sanctions within the allotted time. Therefore, the WCAB imposed sanctions of $250.00 against each individual lien claimant and found SIR Practice Solutions, LLC jointly and severally liable for these sanctions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalSanctionsLien ClaimantsSIR Practice SolutionsPetition for ReconsiderationSkeletal PetitionAppeals Board Rule 10846Labor Code Section 5813Notice of Intention to Impose Sanctions
References
6
Case No. ADJ1761179 (LBO 0351115), ADJ3800791, ADJ2478410
Regular
Mar 21, 2013

MARIA MELENDEZ vs. KELERMEYER BUILDING SERVICES, INC.; REHAB SOLUTIONS aka NORTH AMERICAN DISTRIBUTORS

This case involves a lien claimant, Rehab Solutions, whose lien was dismissed by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) due to non-appearance at a lien conference and failure to respond to a Notice of Intention to Dismiss. Rehab Solutions petitioned for reconsideration, arguing they received neither notice nor an opportunity to be heard. The WCJ's report, adopted by the WCAB, found that Rehab Solutions was properly noticed for the lien conference and later received a Notice of Intention to Dismiss, but failed to appear or respond for approximately 90 days. Consequently, the WCAB denied the Petition for Reconsideration, though they admonished the lien claimant that further frivolous filings would result in sanctions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJLien ClaimantOrder Dismissing LienDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedLien ConferenceNotice of HearingNotice of Intention to Dismiss LienProof of Service
References
0
Case No. ADJ7787891
Regular
Sep 25, 2015

JORGE CERVANTES vs. JBM SPORT TRUCK AND ACCESSORIES, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY

Here's a summary for a lawyer, in a maximum of four sentences: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversing a prior decision that disallowed a lien claimant's invoice for photocopying services. The Board found that the lien claimant, California Imaging Solutions, acted as an agent or independent contractor for applicant's attorney, a member of the State Bar. This status exempted them from Business and Professions Code registration and bonding requirements. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level to determine the reasonable fee for the lien claimant's services.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationIndependent ContractorBusiness and Professions Code Section 22451Registration RequirementBonding RequirementProfessional PhotocopierState Bar MemberApplicant's Attorney
References
10
Case No. ADJ7628583
Regular
Nov 04, 2013

ARMANDO LOPEZ vs. WM BOLTHOUSE FARMS, SEDGWICK CMS

The Appeals Board denied Rehab Solutions' Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the dismissal of its lien. Although the Board found the Petition timely, it determined Rehab Solutions was properly served notice of the lien conference. Consequently, the lien was dismissed with prejudice for failure to pay the activation fee as required by Labor Code section 4903.06(a)(4). The matter returns to the trial level for a scheduled November 6, 2013 lien conference concerning Rehab Solutions' new lien.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationLien Activation FeeLabor Code section 4903.06Lien ConferenceDismissal with PrejudiceProof of ServiceOfficial Address RecordCase Participant
References
5
Case No. ADJ9289375
Regular
Jan 11, 2016

ESTEBAN MIRANDA vs. HEARTLAND PRECISION, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to lien claimant California Imaging Solutions, Inc. (CIS). The prior decision disallowed CIS's lien based on its failure to register as a professional copier and meet its burden of proof for an exemption. The Board reversed, holding that CIS made an unrebutted prima facie showing that it acted as an agent or independent contractor for attorneys, thus exempting it from registration requirements under Business and Professions Code section 22451(b), consistent with the en banc decision in *Cornejo*. The case was remanded for a new decision on the lien.

WCABLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationBusiness and Professions Code Section 22451Independent ContractorState Bar MemberPhotocopier ServicesLicensing ExemptionCornejo v. Younique Café
References
1
Case No. ADJ8387626
Regular
Oct 29, 2015

ANA DIAZ vs. SAMBRAILO PACKAGING, INC., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a lien claim for photocopying services provided by California Imaging Solutions (CIS). The WCJ initially disallowed the lien because CIS was not registered as a professional photocopier, as required by Business and Professions Code section 22450. However, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that CIS was exempt from this registration requirement under Business and Professions Code section 22451(b) because it acted as an agent or independent contractor for applicant's attorney. The case is returned to the trial level to address record deficiencies and re-evaluate the lien claim's compensability in light of this exemption.

Lien ClaimantReconsiderationFindings And OrderAdministrative Law JudgeWCJProfessional PhotocopierBusiness and Professions Code Section 22450Business and Professions Code Section 22451(b)State BarAgent
References
3
Case No. ADJ6981750
Regular
Jan 13, 2017

GUMERSINDO DELEON vs. ESPARZA ENTERPRISES, INC.

This case concerns a lien claimant's failure to pay a $100.00 lien activation fee required by Labor Code section 4903.06 by the date of a lien conference. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is considering rescinding the order dismissing the lien, but only if the fee is paid within ten days of this notice. The WCAB's intention is based on a court order allowing lien activation fees to be paid between November 9, 2015, and December 31, 2015, and the lien claimant's assertion of computer problems. If payment is received, the lien claim will be returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Lien activation feeLabor Code Section 4903.06ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimWCJDWCAngelotti Chiropractic v. BakerPreliminary injunctionNinth CircuitVacating injunction
References
7
Case No. ADJ6699348
Regular
Mar 17, 2016

KANON MONKIEWICZ vs. RM STORE FIXTURES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued a Notice of Intention to find that Labor Code section 4903.8(a) does not preclude awards to lien claimants Rx Funding Solutions, LLC and PharmaFinance, LLC. This is because the 2014 amendments to section 4903.8(a)(2) specify that it does not apply to assignments completed prior to January 1, 2013. Both of the lien claimants' assignments were made before this date, thus exempting them from the preclusion. The WCAB is amending its previous order and returning the case to the trial level for further proceedings on the merits of the liens.

Labor Code 4903.8Lien claimantsAssignment of receivablesCessation of businessPharmacy lienMedical lienSB 863AB 2732Prospective vs. retrospective applicationWCAB rules
References
10
Case No. ADJ1035201
Regular
Oct 04, 2016

VICTOR DURAN vs. DONUT INN, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board is considering rescinding an order that dismissed Metro Med Shockwave's lien claim for failure to pay a $\$100$ lien activation fee. The WCJ dismissed the lien because the fee was not paid before the lien conference, citing prior precedent. However, the lien claimant argues they had until December 31, 2015, to pay the fee based on a DWC Newsline article referencing a court order. The Board intends to rescind the dismissal if the fee is paid within ten days, allowing further proceedings on the lien claim.

Labor Code section 4903.06Lien activation feeWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardMetro Med ShockwaveFigueroa v. B.C Doering Co.Angelotti Chiropractic v. BakerPreliminary injunctionDWC NewslineReconsiderationRescind order
References
2
Case No. ADJ7547932
Regular
Jun 10, 2013

CBLIA RAMIREZ vs. TACO BELLZ PIZZA HOT, GALLAGHER BASSETT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Rehab Solutions' petition for reconsideration. The Board upheld the administrative law judge's dismissal of Rehab Solutions' lien claim. This dismissal was due to the lien claimant's failure to appear at the lien conference and provide proof of paying the required $100 lien activation fee as mandated by Labor Code section 4903.06. The Board found that Rehab Solutions was properly served with notice of the conference, making their arguments for improper service unpersuasive.

Lien activation feeLabor Code section 4903.06WCABPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing Lien ClaimLien conferenceProof of paymentOfficial Address RecordDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedCompromise and Release
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 3,332 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational