CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Smith v. New York State & Local Retirement Systems

Petitioner, a taxpayer services representative, sustained a back injury in March 1981 while lifting forms, leading to a decline in attendance and eventual termination in November 1989. She applied for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits, both of which were denied by the Comptroller. The accidental disability claim was denied because the incident was not deemed an 'accident' under Retirement and Security Law § 63. The ordinary disability claim was denied as untimely, having been filed approximately six months after her termination, exceeding the 90-day limit stipulated by Retirement and Social Security Law § 62. The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to the ordinary disability denial due to untimeliness and transferred the accidental disability challenge to this Court. This Court confirmed the Comptroller's determination on both counts, rejecting the petitioner's estoppel argument regarding the untimely ordinary disability application and finding substantial evidence to support the finding that the injury did not constitute an 'accident' within the meaning of the relevant law, as it resulted from ordinary employment duties without an unexpected event.

Disability Retirement BenefitsAccidental DisabilityOrdinary DisabilityUntimely ApplicationEstoppel Against GovernmentWork-Related InjuryBack InjuryDefinition of AccidentOrdinary Employment DutiesSubstantial Evidence Review
References
16
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Jones v. New York State & Local Employees Retirement System

Petitioner, a registered nurse, sought ordinary and accidental disability retirement benefits after inhaling noxious fumes at Rome City Hospital. His ordinary disability application was denied as untimely, filed beyond the 90-day post-termination period. The accidental disability claim was also rejected because his prolonged exposure to fumes was not considered a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance' or an accidental injury under Retirement and Social Security Law § 63. The court upheld the respondent's determination, concluding that substantial evidence supported the finding that no accident occurred. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Disability RetirementAccidental InjuryTimely FilingCPLR Article 78Noxious FumesOrdinary DisabilityRetirement and Social Security LawRegistered NurseRome City HospitalAlbany County
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Di Guida v. McCall

Petitioner, a food service worker, sought accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits after being injured in a fall on milk crates while leaving work. Respondent denied the application for accidental disability benefits, finding the petitioner was not "in service" at the time of the injury, a determination upheld by the court based on substantial evidence and the resolution of a credibility issue. The denial of ordinary disability benefits was also affirmed, supported by a physician's report that found no significant neck or shoulder injury or functional disability. Consequently, the determination was confirmed, and the petition dismissed.

accidental disabilityordinary disabilityretirement benefitsfood service workerfall injuryin servicecredibilitymedical examinationfunctional disabilityCPLR article 78
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Esposito v. Regan

Petitioner, a police officer from the Nassau County Police Department, sought accidental disability retirement benefits due to back injuries sustained in duty-related accidents in 1979, 1982, and 1985. The respondent denied the application. A Hearing Officer found the incidents were not 'accidents' as defined by Retirement and Social Security Law § 363, and that the petitioner did not prove permanent inability to perform restricted duty. Upon review, the court confirmed the Hearing Officer's findings, concluding that the injuries arose from routine duties rather than unexpected events, thus not qualifying for accidental disability benefits. The determination was confirmed, and the petition dismissed.

Accidental Disability Retirement BenefitsPolice OfficerBack InjuryDuty-Related AccidentRetirement and Social Security LawArticle 78 ProceedingCredibility DeterminationRoutine DutiesUnexpected EventPermanent Disability
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Hee Sook Lee v. Regan

This case is a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination that denied the petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. The court found substantial evidence to support the respondent's determination that the petitioner is not permanently disabled. The medical evidence presented conflicting diagnoses, but the court upheld the respondent's right to weigh medical opinions. Decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board were noted as not binding on the respondent. The determination was confirmed, and the petition dismissed.

Accidental DisabilityRetirement BenefitsMedical EvidenceConflicting DiagnosesPermanent DisabilityAdministrative ReviewJudicial ReviewSubstantial EvidenceWorkers' Compensation Decisions
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Manney v. McCall

Petitioner, a hospital nursing station clerk, was injured while assisting an X-ray technician and sought accidental disability retirement benefits. Her application was initially denied. Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer upheld the denial, concluding that the petitioner had not demonstrated permanent incapacitation from her duties. This determination was affirmed by the respondent. The court confirmed the respondent's decision, emphasizing that the respondent has exclusive authority to evaluate competing medical opinions, and credited the Retirement System's expert who found only a mild partial disability. The court also noted that awards from Social Security or workers' compensation are not binding on the respondent.

Accidental disability retirement benefitsPermanent incapacitationMedical opinion evaluationCPLR article 78 proceedingNew York State and Local Retirement SystemWorkers' compensation benefitsSocial Security benefitsJudicial reviewAdministrative determinationEvidentiary weight
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

McGerald v. DiNapoli

Petitioner, a police officer for the Suffolk County Police Department, sought accidental disability retirement benefits following three separate incidents in 1990 and 1998 that allegedly caused disabling back injuries. Respondent Comptroller denied the application. The Comptroller found that the February 2, 1990 and March 30, 1998 incidents (slipping on wet grass, slipping on stairs at police headquarters) did not constitute accidents under Retirement and Social Security Law § 363, as they occurred during ordinary employment duties without an unexpected event. For the March 29, 1998 incident, the Comptroller concluded that petitioner failed to provide timely notice to his employer as required by Retirement and Social Security Law § 363 (c) and Workers’ Compensation Law § 18. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued, with the court confirming the Comptroller's determination and dismissing the petition.

Accidental Disability RetirementPolice Officer InjurySuffolk County PoliceComptroller DeterminationRetirement and Social Security LawTimely NoticeOrdinary Employment DutiesSlipping IncidentBack Injury ClaimCPLR Article 78 Proceeding
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Browne v. DiNapoli

The petitioner, a police officer, sought accidental and performance of duty disability retirement benefits after being injured in 2005. His applications were denied, and this denial was upheld after a hearing, finding he was not permanently incapacitated. The petitioner initiated a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge this determination. The court considered conflicting medical evidence, including the petitioner's evidence of a 30% shoulder loss of use and radiculopathy, and an orthopedist's report for the New York State and Local Retirement System concluding the petitioner was not disabled. The court ultimately confirmed the respondent's determination, citing substantial evidence from the orthopedist's rational and fact-based medical opinion.

Disability RetirementPolice Officer InjuryAccidental DisabilityPerformance of Duty DisabilityCPLR Article 78Medical IncapacitationConflicting Medical EvidenceOrthopedic EvaluationRadiculopathyShoulder Injury
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rossiello v. Regan

Petitioner, a supervisor for the Town of Hempstead Parks Department, was injured in August 1990 and subsequently applied for accidental disability retirement benefits. The application was denied by the New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System and later confirmed by the Comptroller, who found petitioner was not permanently incapacitated despite receiving workers' compensation benefits. Medical experts presented conflicting opinions on the permanency of petitioner's disability, with the Comptroller crediting the Retirement System's expert. The court upheld the Comptroller's determination, finding it supported by substantial evidence. The court also dismissed claims of prejudice and bias against the Hearing Officer, though it decried the officer's 'callous treatment' of the petitioner.

Accidental Disability RetirementPermanent IncapacityWorkers' CompensationMedical Opinion ConflictComptroller DeterminationSubstantial EvidenceJudicial ReviewHearing Officer BiasPublic EmployeesNew York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mirrer v. Hevesi

The petitioner, a police sergeant for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, sought accidental and performance of duty disability retirement benefits after slipping from a fire truck due to foam on his shoes. The respondent Comptroller denied his applications, finding that the incident was not an 'accident' under the Retirement and Social Security Law, as slipping on foam was an inherent risk of his job duties, and that he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties. The court affirmed the Comptroller's determination, citing substantial evidence supporting both findings, including the resolution of conflicting expert medical opinions regarding permanent disability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Disability Retirement BenefitsAccidental DisabilityPerformance of Duty DisabilityPolice SergeantFirefighting OperationsLa Guardia AirportSlip and FallInherent Risk of EmploymentCervical Spine InjuryExpert Medical Evidence
References
5
Showing 1-10 of 9,307 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational