CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ6712588
Regular
Aug 12, 2010

MARIA NAVARRO vs. STAFF CHEX, AIG INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration for Applicant Maria Navarro, rescinding a prior award. The Board found a potential due process violation because the Applicant claimed she was never served with the Disability Evaluation Unit's (DEU) rating. As the DEU rating was not found in the official record of proceedings, the Board returned the case for further proceedings, ordering the DEU rating be properly added to the record and served on all parties. This ensures the Applicant has an opportunity to challenge the rating and exercise her due process rights.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardPermanent DisabilityDue ProcessNoticeCross-examinationDisability Evaluation UnitDEUProof of Service
References
Case No. ADJ18157692
Regular
Oct 22, 2025

ROLANDO GARCIA vs. HOLLENBECK PALMS, ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS

Applicant filed a petition for removal from an order taking the matter off calendar, contending that the issue of striking the qualified medical evaluator (QME) was ripe for adjudication. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal, finding that the WCJ's order violated due process by being issued without creating a record or explaining the need for further development. As a decision after removal, the WCAB rescinded the August 12, 2025 order and returned the matter to the trial level to create a proper record, emphasizing the due process rights of all parties, including the QME, in such proceedings.

Petition for RemovalQualified Medical Evaluator (QME)Striking QMEAdmissibility of ReportsLabor Code Section 4628Due ProcessIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceMedical-Legal ExpensesPhysician's Liability
References
Case No. SAU8840977
Regular
Nov 03, 2025

ERIC BRAGER vs. RKL TECHNOLOGIES, CENTER FOR BETTER HEALTH dba SOUTHLAND SPINE AND REHABILITATION

Liaison counsel for insurance carriers sought reconsideration or removal of a Discovery Order issued by a workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on August 1, 2025, which voided prior orders and mandated refiling of documents. The carriers argued lack of jurisdiction, insufficient evidence, and violation of due process, while a lien claimant opposed, asserting the judge was disqualified. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the Discovery Order was not a final order, but granted removal, concluding the order violated due process due to lack of notice and a fair hearing. Consequently, the Appeals Board rescinded the Discovery Order and returned the matter for further proceedings to properly adjudicate the allegations against the prior WCJ's orders.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalDiscovery OrderVoiding Prior OrdersDisqualification of JudgeDue ProcessFair HearingLabor Code Section 5909Labor Code Section 5313
References
Case No. OAK 0325086
Regular
Sep 11, 2007

KENNETH GMEINER vs. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the employer's petition for reconsideration as premature, but granted removal to address the judge's improper deferral of a permanent disability decision. The judge had vacated submission, citing uncertainty about the validity of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS) based on a pending case. The Board ruled that deferring a decision on permanent disability due to an unresolved legal issue concerning the PDRS's validity prejudiced the parties and violated the mandate for expeditious adjudication.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalFindings and Order Vacating SubmissionPermanent Disability Rating ScheduleSB 899Boughner v. CompUSAInc.Costa v. HardyAdministrative Director
References
Case No. ADJ9893563
Regular
Aug 19, 2019

ISRAEL ANGULO RUGERIO vs. ANS CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a decision regarding TruCare Pharmacy's liens. The prior decision found the defendant failed to prove TruCare was subject to a statutory stay, as it did not demonstrate a controlling indicted provider under Labor Code section 139.21. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and returned the case to the trial level for consolidation with a master file proceeding addressing common issues concerning TruCare and Labor Code section 4615. This consolidation aims to ensure consistent rulings, due process, and judicial economy given the complex factual and legal issues involved.

TruCare PharmacyLabor Code section 4615WCJPetition for ReconsiderationOrder of ConsolidationSpecial Adjudication UnitMaster Filelien claimantindictmentstay
References
Case No. ADJ16334598
Regular
Oct 13, 2025

ANTHONY REYES vs. XPO LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE

Applicant Anthony Reyes filed a petition for removal challenging an order by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that took the matter off calendar. The WCAB granted removal, determining that the WCJ's order violated the parties' right to due process by failing to create a record or explain the deferral of the additional panels issue, thus constituting irreparable harm. As a Decision After Removal, the Appeals Board rescinded the April 24, 2025, order taking the matter off calendar and returned the case to the trial level to establish a proper record. The Board explicitly stated it made no judgment on the merits of additional panels at this stage due to the lack of a formal record.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Matter Off CalendarAdditional PanelsDue Process ViolationIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceRecord CreationTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRescind Order
References
Case No. ADJ11008178
Regular
Oct 09, 2020

JAMIE BODINE vs. EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP II, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision awarding continuing temporary disability benefits to the applicant. The defendant argued that proceeding to trial on the issue of temporary disability violated its due process rights due to insufficient notice. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the original award, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board found that the defendant was not provided with proper notice regarding the temporary disability issue, thus violating its due process rights.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardTemporary DisabilityDue ProcessExpedited HearingDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedMedical TreatmentWork RestrictionsAccommodation
References
Case No. ADJ9805381 ADJ7750980
Regular
Jun 06, 2017

DOROTHY CLAIBORNE vs. PRECIOUS HOME COMPANION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, FIRSTCOMP INSURANCE SERVICES

This case involves a petition for reconsideration by CIGA concerning an administrative law judge's (WCJ) order dismissing the applicant's cumulative trauma claim. The WCAB granted CIGA's petition, rescinded the WCJ's dismissal order, and returned the case to the trial level. The Board found that the previous decision to defer the date of injury was not a final order and that due process requires a full adjudication of the applicant's cumulative trauma injury date. Therefore, the case must be further developed to determine the precise date of injury for the applicant's cumulative trauma claim.

CIGAPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ OrderCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryAdjudicationAppellate ProceedingsWrit of ReviewFinal OrderInterlocutory
References
Case No. ADJ10160818; ADJ1459849
Regular
Oct 27, 2025

PHILIP SCHULTZ vs. SAITEK INDUSTRIES, LTD.; CIGA

This case involves Philip Schultz, who filed an application for adjudication claiming a back injury. Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers) sought reconsideration of a prior Appeals Board decision that erroneously identified Travelers as the workers' compensation carrier for Saitek Industries, Ltd. in 2001, despite Travelers having been dismissed from the case due to lack of coverage. The Appeals Board granted Travelers' petition for reconsideration, acknowledging its constitutional mandate to ensure substantial justice and correct clerical errors. The Board issued a notice of intention to amend its December 4, 2023 decision to strike the erroneous Finding 2, which incorrectly attributed coverage to Travelers.

Petition for ReconsiderationClerical ErrorWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDeclaraton of ReadinessCompromise and ReleaseCumulative InjurySubstantial JusticeDue ProcessNotice and Opportunity to Be HeardJurisdiction
References
Showing 1-10 of 3,142 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational