CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3525697 (LAO 0534774) ADJ2342373 (LAO 0512482) ADJ1310306 (LAO 0568035) ADJ2645702 (LAO 0519888) ADJ1384751 (LAO 0568036) ADJ2871875 (ANA 0235799)
Regular
Feb 03, 2017

ALICE BRYANT vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERITY OF CALIFORNIA, permissibly self-insured, UCLA MEDICAL CENTER; SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This case involves applicant Alice Bryant's petition for reconsideration of prior dismissed workers' compensation claims and a Labor Code section 132a retaliation claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's findings. The WCAB concluded that Bryant's claims were previously dismissed, with some dismissed by her own request and others for failure to prosecute. Furthermore, the WCAB found that Bryant failed to demonstrate extrinsic fraud and lacked the required diligence to reopen these final dismissals, even with newly discovered evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRegents of the University of CaliforniaSedgwick Claims Management ServicesPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrdersWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeLabor Code section 132aRetaliation claimExtrinsic fraudDismissed claims
References
Case No. ADJ1282419 (LAO 0846452) ADJ915214 (LAO 0854736)
Regular
Feb 01, 2010

VALERIE VANCE DILLON vs. TJ MAXX, CNA CLAIMS PLUS

This case involves a Compromise and Release agreement between the applicant and defendants. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and returned the matter to the trial level. This action is contingent on the workers' compensation administrative law judge approving the settlement. If not approved, the original decision could be reinstated, with the right to seek reconsideration.

Compromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationGrant ReconsiderationRescind DecisionTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeSalvage and ClaimsSalvage and ClaimsSalvage and Claims
References
Case No. ADJ11029299 ADJ10664592
Regular
May 03, 2018

KATHLEEN CAMPER vs. VAL VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PSI, administered by KEENAN \u0026 ASSOCIATES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's initial timely filed claim for cumulative trauma injury should be amended to conform to proof of a specific back injury on May 5, 2016. The Board rescinded the judge's order finding the applicant took nothing and instead ordered the dismissal of the defendant's later-filed specific injury claim. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the amended claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderAdministrative Law JudgeCustodianCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryApplication for Adjudication of ClaimDue ProcessQualified Medical Examiner
References
Case No. ADJ7940890
Regular
Dec 13, 2013

Katherine Hunter vs. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior finding, ruling that the applicant's claim is barred by the statute of limitations. The applicant filed her claim over one year after receiving a denial of benefits, which restarted the one-year limitations period. The Board found no evidence presented by the applicant to support any exceptions to the statute of limitations, despite her arguments of confusion regarding a withdrawal form. Therefore, the applicant's claim was dismissed, except for potential medical-legal costs.

Statute of LimitationsWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactDWC-1Notice of DenialTollingAffirmative DefenseBurden of ProofLabor Code Section 5405
References
Case No. ADJ15763825
Regular
Sep 16, 2025

CLAUDIO CARDOZO vs. ROCK AND ROLL CAR WASH, REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company dba Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies. The petition challenged a lien trial decision concerning a medical-legal evaluation performed by Dr. Michaels of Premier Psychological Services. The WCJ found that a medical dispute regarding psyche existed at the time of the evaluation, Dr. Michaels was validly designated as the Primary Treating Physician, and the evaluation was not barred by the 60-day rule for new claims as it was an amendment to an already accepted claim. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and denied the petition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code Section 5909Adjudication NumberOpinion and Order Denying PetitionWCJ ReportEAMS TransmissionNotice of TransmissionProof of ServiceFindings and Order
References
Case No. ADJ7724328
Regular
Mar 12, 2013

KENTON NAIRNE vs. ROBERT McPEAK, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, overturning a prior finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury. The Board found the applicant's claim was barred by the statute of limitations, as the application was filed more than one year after the date of injury. The Board determined that the applicant's retention of a personal injury attorney negated any claim of detrimental reliance on the employer's insurer's potentially erroneous advice. Therefore, the Board ordered that the applicant take nothing on his claim.

WCABReconsiderationEstoppelStatute of LimitationsLabor Code Section 5405Industrial InjuryHome Care ProviderDWC-1 Claim FormDenial of ClaimPersonal Injury Attorney
References
Case No. LAO 823855, LAO 823856
Regular
Oct 03, 2007

PEDRO M. RODRIGUEZ vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY

The applicant sought reconsideration of a denial of workers' compensation benefits, which was based on the finding that his claims were filed after notice of termination. The Board affirmed the denial, concluding that the applicant's job abandonment led to a termination prior to the filing of his claims. The Board also determined that the employer properly denied both the specific and cumulative trauma claims, thus negating a presumption of compensability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderFindings of FactAdministrative Law JudgeApplicantDefendantRalphs Grocery CompanySecurity GuardIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ9373269, ADJ9373270
Regular
Dec 12, 2017

SOCORRO SALAZAR vs. MV TRANSPORTATION, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant failed to prove her injury was presumptively compensable under Labor Code section 5402. The Board clarified that the 90-day presumption period begins when an employee files a claim form, not when the employer receives notice of injury. The Board affirmed that a claim form, not an Application for Adjudication of Claim, is the legally mandated method for initiating a workers' compensation claim. Therefore, the applicant did not meet her burden of proof for presumptive compensability.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationLabor Code section 5402presumption of compensabilityclaim formdenial of liabilityApplication for Adjudication of Claimrebuttable presumptionfraudulent attemptsstatutory references
References
Case No. ADJ8221321
Regular
Nov 09, 2020

ANTHONY PAUL MAGOULAS, PAUL MAGOULAS (deceased) vs. LAS POSAS COUNTRY CLUB, HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDMENITY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the original findings and returned the case to trial for further proceedings. The Board determined the death benefit claim was timely filed under Labor Code § 5406, even though it was erroneously filed under the decedent's inter vivos claim number. Additionally, the Board found that dependency is determined at the time of injury, not death, and the original finding of no dependent was legally inaccurate and unsupported by the record. Therefore, the WCAB remanded the case to address the dependency issue and potentially assign a separate adjudication number to the death claim.

WCABReconsiderationDeath ClaimStatute of LimitationsLabor Code Section 5406Inter Vivos ClaimDependencyLabor Code Section 3501Adjudication NumberLiberal Construction
References
Showing 1-10 of 6,693 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational