CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ6921831, ADJ9093989
Regular
May 02, 2016

KISCHA LOVING vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION VENTURA YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This order denies Kischa Loving's petition for reconsideration in two workers' compensation cases against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted the reasoning of the administrative law judge's report. No new evidence or arguments were presented to warrant overturning the original decision. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportCalifornia Department of Corrections and RehabilitationVentura Youth Correctional FacilityState Compensation Insurance Fundadministrative law judgedenial of reconsiderationADJ6921831ADJ9093989
References
Case No. ADJ599176 (SAC 0333692) ADJ2396484 (RDG 0122019) ADJ7950339
Regular
Mar 21, 2017

Fernando Muniz Villalpando vs. Doherty Brothers, Martin Dusters, State Compensation Insurance Fund

This case involves an applicant seeking to self-administer his Medical Set-Aside Account (MSA) after previously agreeing to third-party administration by Bridge Pointe/NuQuest. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior order, and returned the matter to the trial level. The Board found that the trial judge needs to review the original agreement to determine if it allows for a change of administration or if applicant has contractual rights to pursue this. Further proceedings will assess applicant's competency for self-administration and any opposition from the defendant.

Medical Set-Aside AccountMSAPetition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings and OrderMedical Set-Aside Account administrationself-administrationBridge PointeNuQuestState Compensation Insurance FundCompromise and Release Agreement
References
Case No. ADJ7837345
Regular
Jun 28, 2012

CAESAR ALCORDO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration of a decision regarding Caesar Alcords' claim against the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and State Compensation Insurance Fund. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, which denied reconsideration. The key issue concerned custodial duties under Labor Code 3212.2, which the Board clarified is not limited to employees whose duties are *primarily* custodial.

WCABLabor Code 3212.2custodial dutiescorrectional employeesPetition for Reconsiderationdenial of reconsiderationReeves v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.workers' compensation administrative law judgeADJ7837345Sacramento District Office
References
Case No. ADJ847031
Regular
Dec 10, 2010

CARLOS REYES vs. EL POLLO LOCO, PACIFIC COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Carlos Reyes v. El Pollo Loco and Pacific Compensation Insurance Company. The Board adopted the WCJ's report as the basis for the denial. Additionally, the Board corrected a clerical error in the caption of the September 20, 2010 Findings and Order to accurately reflect the defendant's name as "Pacific Compensation Insurance Company." Therefore, the reconsideration is denied, and the caption is corrected.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeFindings and OrderClerical ErrorEAMSCaption CorrectionDefendant Name CorrectionIN-HOUSE LITIGATION DEPARTMENTUNIVERSAL ASSIGNED NAME
References
Case No. SAC 316687
Regular
Feb 28, 2008

STEVE OLSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a correctional lieutenant claiming cumulative industrial injury to his heart, hypertension, diabetes, and GERD. The original decision apportioned 80% of his permanent disability to non-industrial causes, but the Appeals Board rescinded this. The Board determined that Labor Code section 4663(e) exempts safety officers like the applicant from apportionment for presumed injuries, and the calculation of permanent disability indemnity must now follow the *Brodie/Welcher* standard.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSAC 316687Steve OlsonDepartment of CorrectionsState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Decision After Reconsiderationcorrectional lieutenantcumulative industrial injuryhearthypertension
References
Case No. ADJ4653074 (BAK 0152415)
Regular
Oct 11, 2013

ROBERT HUFF vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's decision regarding applicant Robert Huff's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Corrections. The Board amended the findings to deny temporary total disability benefits for the period December 9, 2009, to March 7, 2011, as the applicant had exhausted his 104-week limit. The Board also deferred the issues of permanent disability and attorney's fees, remanding the matter for a new rating based on the orthopedic Agreed Medical Evaluator's March 5, 2012 report, while affirming the rejection of the psychiatric AME's apportionment. Finally, the Board corrected a clerical error regarding the weekly rate for permanent disability benefits.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDROBERT HUFFCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSPermissibly UninsuredSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings of Fact Award and OpinionWCJAgreed Medical EvaluatorsAME
References
Case No. ADJ10945029
Regular
Sep 17, 2018

DANIEL BORRERO vs. PREFERRED BUILDING SERVICES dba PREFERRED BUILDING \& MAINTENANCE, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board rescinded the administrative law judge's dismissal order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings. This action was based on the applicant's contention that the dismissal was improper as he had amended his claim to name the correct employer and insurer. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and recommendation supporting reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder of DismissalAmendmentCorrect EmployerCorrect InsurerTrial LevelRescindWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeFurther Proceedings
References
Case No. ADJ11428234
Regular
Oct 17, 2025

RAMON COLLADO vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTINELA STATE PRISON

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to study the factual and legal issues in Ramon Collado's case against the California Department of Corrections and Centinela State Prison. Collado sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings and Order from July 28, 2021, which concluded he failed to prove an industrially caused heart/hypertension injury between December 20, 2012, and August 14, 2018. The Board found the Qualified Medical Evaluator's opinion on whether Collado's condition was an aggravation or mere exacerbation of prior injuries was unclear and contradictory, failing to constitute substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings, including the development of the medical record and a determination on the applicability of Labor Code section 3212 presumptions.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardRamon ColladoCalifornia Department of CorrectionsCentinela State PrisonState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings and Orderworkers' compensation administrative law judgeindustrially caused injuryexacerbation
References
Showing 1-10 of 6,699 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational