CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ10456401
Regular
Oct 25, 2016

JUAN RIVAS vs. NORTH AMERICAN TRAILER, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

This case concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Juan Rivas related to a workers' compensation award. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report. Adopting the WCJ's reasoning, the Board denied Rivas's petition for reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationDeniedWCJ ReportAdoptedIncorporatedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAward (Assumed)Van Nuys District OfficeADJ10456401North American Trailer
References
Case No. ADJ8541832
Regular
Oct 20, 2016

JOE JOHN VENTURA vs. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Joe John Ventura's petition for reconsideration in this case against The Home Depot, Inc. The Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Therefore, the petition was denied, and the previous decision stands.

Ventura v. Home DepotHelmsman Management ServicesPetition for ReconsiderationDeniedWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ ReportAdoptedIncorporatedADJ8541832Stockton District Office
References
Case No. ADJ10454611
Regular
Jun 14, 2018

MARK ELLIOTT vs. CUSTOM WOOD FINISHING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Mark Elliott's Petition for Reconsideration in case ADJ10454611. The Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in its decision. No specific details of the original claim or the WCJ's report are provided in this excerpt. Therefore, the basis for the denial remains unspecified.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationDeniedWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJ reportAdoptedIncorporatedMark ElliottCustom Wood FinishingState Compensation Insurance Fund
References
Case No. SFO 0421755
Regular
May 30, 2008

FRANK COVERSON vs. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT/CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO administered by TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Frank Coverson's petition for reconsideration in Case No. SFO 0421755. The Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. The applicant's request to have the prior decision reviewed was thus rejected.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeDenying ReconsiderationSan Francisco Unified School DistrictTristar Risk ManagementFrank CoversonSFO 0421755Order Denying ReconsiderationWCJ Report
References
Case No. ADJ2285767
Regular
Oct 23, 2013

JOSE CORRALES vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Jose Corrales' Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the reasoning of the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which was not provided. This order means Corrales' prior request for a review of a decision was unsuccessful. The denial was issued on October 23, 2013.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Reconsideration DeniedWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeReport of WCJAdopt and IncorporateCity of Los AngelesPermissibly Self-InsuredADJ2285767LAO 0764751Jose Corrales
References
Case No. ADJ6799286
Regular
Feb 08, 2013

OLEGARIO CHAVEZ vs. REINALDA FLORES GARCIA, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) case, ADJ6799286, involved a petition for reconsideration filed by Olegario Chavez. The WCAB dismissed Chavez's petition because it was both unverified and not timely filed. Even if the petition had been properly filed, the WCAB would have denied it on its merits, adopting the reasoning of the WCJ.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissal OrderUnverified PetitionUntimely FilingWCJ ReportAdopted ReportDenied PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeLong Beach District Office
References
Case No. ADJ1627678 (POM 0300392)
Regular
Jun 02, 2011

SUZANNE SIEVERTSON vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

This case involves Suzanne Sievertson's workers' compensation claim against the County of San Bernardino. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed a Petition for Reconsideration filed by the applicant. The WCAB adopted the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) and denied the reconsideration.

Petition for ReconsiderationDenying ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJ reportAdopted reportIncorporated reportAdministrative Law JudgePermissibly-InsuredCounty of San BernardinoApplicant
References
Case No. ADJ10551695
Regular
Sep 13, 2018

JESUS TREVINO vs. YOUNG'S MARKET

This case involves an applicant, Jesus Trevino, against defendant Young's Market. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has denied Trevino's Petition for Reconsideration. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in their decision. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration has been officially denied.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportdeny reconsiderationJesus TrevinoYoung's Marketself-insuredADJ10551695Oakland District Officeadministrative law judge
References
Case No. ADJ4082053
Regular
Nov 20, 2008

WALTER MILLINER vs. THE BRISTOL GARDEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision resolving substantive rights or liabilities. Removal was also denied as the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board adopted the WCJ's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Petition for ReconsiderationRemovalInterlocutory OrderFinal OrderSubstantive RightsLiabilitiesWCJPre-trial OrdersEvidenceDiscovery
References
Case No. ADJ2918788
Regular
Nov 21, 2017

CHERYL BARNETTE-POWELL vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Therefore, the applicant's request to have the previous decision reviewed and potentially overturned was unsuccessful. The Board also accepted a supplemental pleading from a lien claimant.

Petition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportAdopt and IncorporateLien claimantSupplemental pleadingAppeals Board Rule 10848Denying petitionWorkers Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Department of CorrectionsState Compensation Insurance Fund
References
Showing 1-10 of 2,240 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational