CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Abbondanzo

The claimant appealed a decision from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which ruled he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits due to misconduct. The misconduct stemmed from a fight with a co-worker during business hours. The court found substantial evidence supported the Board's decision, noting that fighting with a co-worker constitutes disqualifying misconduct, especially given the claimant's prior admonishment for unprofessional conduct. The decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board was affirmed.

Unemployment InsuranceMisconductWorkplace FightingDisqualificationEmployment TerminationAppellate ReviewSubstantial EvidencePrior Admonishment
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Belmar

Claimant, a school guard for the New York City Board of Education, was terminated after failing to disclose an arrest and conviction for third-degree criminal possession of a weapon. The incident occurred during nonworking hours, but the Administrative Law Judge and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that his conduct constituted misconduct directly related to his position and posed a safety risk to students, thus disqualifying him from benefits. The appellate court affirmed the decision, ruling that misconduct affecting integrity, even if off-duty, bears a relationship to employment under Labor Law § 593 (4). The court also held that a certificate of relief from civil disabilities does not exempt an individual from a finding of ineligibility for unemployment benefits due to misconduct.

MisconductUnemployment BenefitsCriminal ConvictionSchool GuardWeapon PossessionOff-Duty ConductCertificate of ReliefCivil DisabilitiesBoard of EducationPersonnel Review
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Meyerovich

The claimant, a maintenance technician, was discharged for misconduct after his manager observed him loafing on the job and he subsequently filed a workers' compensation claim for a back injury, which the employer alleged was false. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified the claimant from receiving benefits due to misconduct, a decision it adhered to upon reconsideration. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence in the manager's testimony that she did not observe the claimant using a shovel during her observation, thus supporting the finding of a false workers' compensation claim and misconduct. The court also noted that conflicting testimony presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve and that prior Workers' Compensation Board decisions were not final regarding the accidental injury issue, thus lacking collateral estoppel effect.

MisconductUnemployment Insurance BenefitsFalse Workers' Compensation ClaimSubstantial EvidenceCredibility IssueDischarge from EmploymentLoafingProbationAppeal Board DecisionAffirmation
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Shapiro

The claimant appealed a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that disqualified him from receiving benefits due to misconduct. This was the claimant's second application for reconsideration, seeking to submit new evidence regarding who closed the register early. The court affirmed the Board's denial of the second application, noting the claimant's failure to provide new evidence and his prior testimony admitting to the misconduct. The court found no abuse of discretion in the Board's decision.

Unemployment InsuranceMisconductAppeal BoardReconsiderationAdministrative LawEvidenceJudicial ReviewEmployment TerminationDue ProcessClaimant Rights
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Tandon

The claimant appealed a decision from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which had disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits due to employment termination caused by misconduct. The record supported the finding that the claimant's discharge stemmed from misconduct, specifically his unauthorized reading of a memorandum regarding his job performance, despite prior warnings about using co-workers' property without permission. The court found that these actions were not inadvertent and were detrimental to the employer's interest. Consequently, the Board's decision was affirmed without costs.

Unemployment InsuranceMisconductJob PerformanceUnauthorized Use of PropertyEmployment TerminationAppeal BoardBenefits DisqualificationAppellate DecisionWorkplace RulesEmployee Conduct
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 22, 1999

In re the Claim of Petrocelli

The claimant was dismissed from her bookkeeper position after threatening a co-worker, a behavior she had been reprimanded for earlier. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that her employment was terminated due to misconduct, disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The appellate court affirmed this decision, finding substantial evidence supported the Board's conclusion. It noted that continuous threatening or harassing behavior despite employer warnings constitutes disqualifying misconduct. The court also clarified that the claimant's differing account of events merely created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve, which it was entitled to do.

Unemployment benefitsMisconductWorkplace threatsHarassmentEmployee dischargeCredibility issueAdministrative appealAppellate DivisionUnemployment Insurance LawEmployer warnings
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re the Claim of Guerin

The Industrial Commissioner appealed a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that overruled the Commissioner's initial determination disqualifying a claimant from receiving benefits. The claimant, a food service worker, was accused of misconduct and faced discharge but did not pursue grievance procedures. The Administrative Law Judge found no substance to the misconduct charge. The Board affirmed no misconduct and reversed the Commissioner's holding that the claimant voluntarily left employment without good cause. The Appellate Court affirmed the Board's decision, distinguishing the case from precedents where claimants actively chose not to grieve or resigned without cause, noting that here, serious, unsubstantiated charges were levied against the claimant, making it unreasonable to deny benefits for failing to exhaust all means to retain employment where he was clearly not wanted.

Unemployment InsuranceVoluntary LeavingGood CauseMisconductGrievance ProcedureBargaining AgreementAppellate ReviewUnsubstantiated ChargesEmployee RightsBenefit Disqualification
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Dec v. Auburn Enlarged School District

Plaintiff, a former high school teacher, sued the Auburn Enlarged School District, its Board of Education, and individual members for defamation, breach of contract, fraud, negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The lawsuit stemmed from a newspaper article alleging his resignation due to sexual misconduct. Defendants sought to amend their answer with new affirmative defenses and moved for summary judgment. The Supreme Court denied several of defendants' proposed amendments and summary judgment motions, except for allowing the amendment for qualified privilege and dismissing certain claims. The appellate court modified the order by granting dismissal of the fraud, intentional, and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims, and allowing the qualified privilege defense, while upholding the denial of summary judgment on breach of contract due to triable issues of fact.

DefamationBreach of ContractFraudNegligenceIntentional Infliction of Emotional DistressQualified PrivilegeSummary JudgmentStatute of FraudsAccord and SatisfactionWorkers' Compensation Law
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Flick v. Eastman Kodak Co.

The Supreme Court's order and judgment granting partial summary judgment to the plaintiff on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) was unanimously affirmed. The plaintiff, an employee of Frontier Insulation/Rochester, Inc., successfully demonstrated a statutory violation and its proximate cause in his injury, supported by co-worker testimonies. The court also affirmed the summary judgment granted to Eastman Kodak, Co., Inc. against Monroe Piping & Sheet Metal, Inc., and Monroe against Frontier Insulation/Rochester, Inc., on common-law indemnification. This was based on the finding that neither Kodak nor Monroe supervised Frontier employees' work or provided safety equipment, and Kodak's periodic inspections did not establish common-law liability. Additionally, Monroe's motion for summary judgment on contractual indemnification against Frontier was affirmed, as the agreement mandated Frontier indemnify Monroe for injuries arising from Frontier’s work without Monroe’s negligence.

Labor LawStatutory ViolationProximate CauseSummary JudgmentCommon-Law IndemnificationContractual IndemnificationWorkplace InjuryAppellate ReviewEmployer LiabilityThird-Party Action
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
May 30, 1995

In re the Claim of Kilgore

Claimant, a bus driver, was terminated following a physical confrontation with a co-worker. An arbitrator upheld her discharge for cause. Subsequently, an Administrative Law Judge denied her unemployment insurance benefits, a decision affirmed by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, citing misconduct. The claimant appealed this decision. The court, giving collateral estoppel effect to the arbitrator's findings due to identity of issue and a full opportunity to litigate, affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence of misconduct.

Unemployment InsuranceMisconductTermination of EmploymentPhysical ConfrontationBus DriverArbitrationAdministrative Law JudgeCollateral EstoppelAppellate ReviewBoard Decision
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 14,307 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational