CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. E1999-00438-CCA-R3-CD
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 28, 2002

State of Tennessee v. Thomas Dee Huskey

Thomas Dee Huskey appealed convictions for aggravated rape, rape, aggravated robbery, robbery, and kidnapping across four victims. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee affirmed convictions in part and reversed in part. The court reversed judgments for three aggravated rape convictions and one especially aggravated kidnapping conviction related to victim D.C. due to improper consolidation, finding the offenses against D.C. were committed differently than the others. The remaining convictions for victims A.D. and G.T. were affirmed, resulting in an adjusted effective sentence of forty-four years in the Department of Correction. The court addressed numerous other issues including speedy trial, unlawful arrest, discovery, and prosecutorial misconduct, generally finding no reversible error.

Criminal LawAppellate ReviewConviction ReversalJudicial DiscretionPretrial PublicityJury SelectionWitness CredibilityEvidentiary RulesSentencing EnhancementConstitutional Rights
References
152
Case No. E2013-00394-CCA-R3-DD
Regular Panel Decision

State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall Davidson

Lemaricus Devall Davidson appealed his convictions for first-degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, especially aggravated kidnapping, aggravated rape, and facilitation of aggravated rape, along with two death sentences. The Supreme Court of Tennessee reviewed several claims of error, including the admission of evidence obtained during house searches, the defendant's statement to law enforcement, spectator buttons, post-mortem photographs, the jury's review of video evidence during deliberations, and expert testimony on ballistics and fingerprints. The Court affirmed Davidson's convictions and death sentences, concluding that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence, that the sentences were not arbitrary, and that the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating factors. It also vacated the Court of Criminal Appeals' remand to the trial court for corrections to the judgment documents.

Capital PunishmentFirst Degree MurderAggravated RapeEspecially Aggravated RobberyEspecially Aggravated KidnappingDNA EvidenceFingerprint AnalysisBallisticsSearch Warrant ValidityMiranda Rights
References
268
Case No. 926 S.W.2d 727 (1994)
Regular Panel Decision
May 23, 1994

State v. Keen

David M. Keen pled guilty to first-degree murder and aggravated rape of an 8-year-old girl. A jury sentenced him to death, finding multiple aggravating circumstances, including the victim's age, heinousness, and the murder occurring during rape. Keen appealed, raising 17 issues, primarily concerning jury instructions on mitigating circumstances and the death penalty statute. The Supreme Court of Tennessee found errors in the jury instructions regarding the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the definition of 'heinous, atrocious, or cruel' aggravating circumstance. Consequently, the Court affirmed the conviction but remanded the case for a new sentencing hearing.

Capital PunishmentDeath PenaltySentencing ErrorJury InstructionsAggravating CircumstancesMitigating CircumstancesFelony MurderRapeChild VictimAutopsy
References
45
Case No. W2020-01208-CCA-R3-CD
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 09, 2022

State of Tennessee v. Zachary Rye Adams

Zachary Rye Adams was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder, two counts of first-degree felony murder, two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, and three counts of aggravated rape in Hardin County. The convictions related to the April 13, 2011 kidnapping, rape, and murder of H.B. Although the State sought the death penalty, Adams received consecutive sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole plus fifty years. On appeal, Adams challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, the denial of a recusal motion, the disqualification of defense counsel, and various evidentiary rulings. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the trial court's judgments, finding no reversible error.

First Degree MurderFelony MurderEspecially Aggravated KidnappingAggravated RapeSufficiency of EvidenceAccomplice Testimony CorroborationJudicial RecusalAttorney DisqualificationEvidentiary RulingsHearsay Evidence
References
59
Case No. E1999-02206-CCA-R3-CD
Regular Panel Decision
May 04, 2001

State s. Anthony Lynn Wyrick

Anthony Lynn Wyrick was convicted of two counts of aggravated rape and sentenced to life without parole. He appealed on several grounds, including the trial court's exclusion of evidence of a prior false accusation of rape by the victim. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee reversed the judgments of conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. The court found that the trial court committed harmful error by not allowing the defendant to cross-examine the victim on the prior false accusation of rape, deeming it necessary for a fair determination of the case given the reliance on the victim's testimony.

Aggravated RapeCriminal AppealSufficiency of EvidenceIn-Court IdentificationPrior False AccusationImpeachmentCross-ExaminationDue ProcessConstitutional LawRecidivist Statute
References
109
Case No. M2023-01033-CCA-R3-CD
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 24, 2024

State of Tennessee v. Lloyd Allard

Defendant Lloyd Allard was convicted of two counts of aggravated rape of a child, two counts of aggravated sexual battery, and twenty-eight counts of especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, receiving an effective sentence of 144 years. He appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, raising challenges regarding the suppression of his custodial statement, the chain of custody for evidence, the excessiveness of his sentence, and the rejection of his insanity defense. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgments, finding no error in the admission of his statements or the establishment of the chain of custody. It further concluded that the evidence did not clearly and convincingly establish an insanity defense and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing.

Aggravated Rape of ChildAggravated Sexual BatterySexual Exploitation of MinorCustodial Statement SuppressionRight to Counsel InvocationMiranda WaiverChain of Custody ChallengeInsanity Defense RejectionDissociative Personality DisorderPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
References
47
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

People v. Painter

This case involves an appeal by a defendant convicted of rape, sexual abuse, and endangering the welfare of a child, and a cross-appeal by the People regarding an order setting aside a conviction for aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree. The Supreme Court initially granted the defendant's motion to set aside the aggravated sexual abuse conviction, citing insufficient evidence. However, the appellate court disagreed, affirming the original judgment of conviction and reversing the order that had set aside the aggravated sexual abuse verdict, thereby reinstating that conviction. The court found that the evidence, including medical testimony and the defendant's confession, was legally sufficient to establish guilt. While an error in admitting certain testimony was noted, it was deemed harmless due to the overwhelming proof against the defendant.

RapeSexual AbuseChild EndangermentAggravated Sexual AbuseJury VerdictLegal Sufficiency of EvidenceHarmless ErrorImproper Bolstering TestimonyDefendant's ConfessionAppellate Review
References
7
Case No. M2016-01673-CCA-R3-PC
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 14, 2017

Tut Mayal Tut v. State of Tennessee

Petitioner Tut Mayal Tut appealed the denial of post-conviction relief for his guilty-pleaded convictions of two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, two counts of especially aggravated robbery, and four counts of aggravated rape. He alleged ineffective assistance of counsel during both his juvenile court transfer hearing and the criminal court plea proceedings. The offenses occurred when Tut was fifteen, involving the brutalization of two victims. The juvenile court transferred his case to criminal court, where he accepted a plea agreement for a 30-year sentence. The post-conviction court denied his petition, concluding he failed to prove deficient performance or prejudice by his counsel regarding trial strategy, bond issues, or the understanding of his sentence. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the post-conviction court's judgment.

Ineffective Assistance of CounselPost-Conviction ReliefJuvenile Transfer HearingGuilty PleaEspecially Aggravated KidnappingEspecially Aggravated RobberyAggravated RapeCriminal ProcedureAppellate ReviewStrickland v. Washington Test
References
27
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Neal v. Blue Circle Cement

The claimant, a laborer, suffered a compensable back injury in November 1998 and returned to work after eight months. In January 2002, he sustained another back injury. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that the January 2002 injury was an aggravation of the prior 1998 injury, assigned disability levels from January 2002 to April 2003, and found no compensable lost time thereafter. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed this decision. The Appellate Division found substantial evidence, including medical testimony and MRI comparisons, to support the Board’s determination regarding the aggravation of the injury and the disability levels. The court also upheld the Board's prerogative to resolve conflicting medical evidence and make credibility determinations, particularly in light of evidence that the claimant exaggerated his symptoms.

Workers' CompensationBack InjuryAggravation of InjuryDisability LevelsMedical EvidenceCredibility AssessmentEmployer LiabilityJudicial ReviewAppellate DivisionAdministrative Law
References
4
Case No. W2002-00260-CCA-R3-PD
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 09, 2003

Glen Bernard Mann v. State of Tennessee

The petitioner, Glen Bernard Mann, appealed the denial of post-conviction relief following his 1994 death sentence for premeditated first-degree murder, aggravated rape, and aggravated burglary. The post-conviction court found he failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel. This appellate court affirmed that denial, reviewing claims regarding underfinancing, excessive workload, unqualified investigators, insufficient investigation, and ineffective use of expert services. The court concluded that no prejudice was shown by clear and convincing evidence, upholding the post-conviction court's decision and analysis.

Post-Conviction ReliefIneffective Assistance of CounselCapital MurderAggravated RapeAggravated BurglaryDeath PenaltyMitigation EvidenceExpert Witness TestimonyPsychological EvaluationFinancial Constraints
References
33
Showing 1-10 of 641 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational