CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ695866
Regular
Jun 09, 2010

MARCIA RAVIZZA vs. ALBERTSON'S

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by Marcia Ravizza against Albertson's. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed the petition and the administrative law judge's report. The WCAB has denied Ravizza's petition for reconsideration, adopting and incorporating the reasons provided in the judge's report. Therefore, the WCAB's decision stands.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDMARCIA RAVIZZAALBERTSON'SADJ695866OAK District OfficeRECONSIDERATION DENIEDWCJ reportPetition for Reconsiderationadministrative law judgerecord review
References
Case No. ADJ6777284, ADJ6777302, ADJ7465280
Regular
Jan 07, 2013

DEBBIE DAY vs. ALBERTSONS, SEDWICK CMS

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involved three cumulative trauma injuries sustained by applicant Debbie Day while employed by Albertsons and SaveMart Supermarkets. The arbitrator issued a Findings, Award, and Order, and subsequently a Report on Petition for Reconsideration. The Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration, adopting the arbitrator's report which clarified that SaveMart/Pegasus's claims for contribution and reimbursement in earlier injury years were moot as their liability stemmed solely from the 2009 injury. The arbitrator's Opinion on Decision was amended to reflect this clarification regarding SaveMart/Pegasus's sole liability for the 2009 injury.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationArbitrator's ReportAmended OpinionCumulative Trauma InjuriesDate of InjuryContributionReimbursementSaveMart SupermarketsAlbertsons
References
Case No. ADJ3419685 (GRO 0029797)
Regular
Dec 10, 2000

MARLENA MOORE vs. ALBERTSONS, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES

This case involves a Petition for Removal filed by Marlena Moore against Albertsons and Specialty Risk Services. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has reviewed the petition and the report from the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Consequently, the WCAB has denied the Petition for Removal. The decision incorporates the reasoning provided in the WCJ's report.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDMARLENA MOOREALBERTSONSSPECIALTY RISK SERVICESPetition for RemovalWCJ reportdenial of removaladministrative law judgeADJ3419685GRO 0029797
References
Case No. ADJ918266 (SFO 0488680), ADJ569020 (SFO 0488681), ADJ977111 (SFO 0488682), ADJ182039 (SFO 0413989)
Regular
Feb 19, 2015

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves multiple workers' compensation claims filed by Robert Rogers against Albertson's/Supervalu. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petitioner's Petition for Removal. This dismissal is solely due to the petitioner having withdrawn their own petition. Therefore, the Board is acting to formally close the removal process as requested.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDismissedWithdrawnCase NumbersAlbertson'sSupervaluSedgwick Claims Management ServicesPermissibly Self-InsuredApplicant
References
Case No. ADJ1342611 (VNO 0441003), ADJ1741808 (VNO 0451440), ADJ1305070 (VNO 0443590), ADJ1323906 (VNO 0450865)
Regular
Jan 08, 2014

Mark A. Margolis vs. Albertson, Sedgwick CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a petition for reconsideration filed by the petitioner. This dismissal occurred because the petitioner voluntarily withdrew their petition. The original decision being reconsidered was issued on October 18, 2012. This order officially closes the reconsideration process for that decision.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissalWithdrawn PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAlbertsonSedgwick CMSMark MargolisOctober 18 2012 decisionADJ1342611VNO 0441003
References
Case No. ADJ3156874
Regular
Sep 23, 2008

KAREN HAMMONDS vs. ALBERTSONS

The WCJ's decision awarding temporary disability benefits more than five years after the injury date was reconsidered. The Board amended the award to only allow payment for temporary total disability, not temporary partial disability.

AlbertsonsKaren HammondsADJ3156874OAK 0305966ReconsiderationFindings and AwardJuly 32008December 222001
References
Case No. ADJ9757218, ADJ10058696
Regular
Aug 21, 2017

MICHAEL GUILLOT vs. ALBERTSONS SUPERVALUE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Amended Order Approving Compromise and Release. The applicant alleged the settlement was procured by fraud, claiming he was intimidated and forced to sign without reviewing it. However, the Board found no evidence or testimony under oath was presented to support these allegations. Consequently, the Board recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the order, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseFraudDuressUndue InfluenceProcedural IrregularitiesGood CauseRescind OrderStipulation
References
Case No. ADJ7182186
Regular

EULISES MENDEZ vs. ALBERTSON'S, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Eulises Mendez's Petition for Reconsideration. This dismissal was based on the principle that reconsideration can only be granted for final orders, not interlocutory procedural rulings. The WCAB clarified that pre-trial orders regarding evidence, discovery, or trial scheduling are not final and thus not subject to reconsideration. The applicant was admonished for filing an improper petition and warned of potential sanctions for future similar conduct.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissalInterlocutory OrderFinal OrderSubstantive RightLiabilityNotice of IntentionWCABALJLabor Code 5900
References
Case No. ADJ3405229 (AHM 0148132)
Regular
Feb 24, 2010

MARIA HERNANDEZ vs. ALBERTSON'S, SPECIALTY RISK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Maria Hernandez's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order determining substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied her petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted. The WCJ's report and recommendation were adopted and incorporated into this decision. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration is dismissed, and removal is denied.

Petition for ReconsiderationFinal OrderSubstantive RightInterlocutory OrderProcedural DecisionEvidentiary DecisionRemovalSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmInadequate Remedy
References
Case No. GRO 0029797
Regular
Dec 21, 2007

MARLENA MOORE vs. ALBERTSONS, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further develop the medical record regarding applicant's headaches. While the applicant's injury to her neck and right shoulder was affirmed, the WCJ's denial of injury to bilateral upper extremities and headaches was modified. The case is remanded for further proceedings specifically on the industrial causation of the applicant's headaches.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMarlena MooreAlbertsonsSpecialty Risk ServicesGRO 0029797Opinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryRight Shoulder InjuryBilateral Upper Extremities
References
Showing 1-10 of 51 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational