CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Daughtry A.

In a neglect proceeding under Family Court Act article 10, the mother appealed an amended order of fact-finding and disposition and an order of protection from the Family Court, Kings County. The appellate court dismissed the appeal from the order of protection, deeming it academic due to its expiration. The court affirmed the amended order of fact-finding and disposition, finding no violation of the mother's due process rights concerning the admission of her statements. The petitioner agency successfully established a prima facie case of neglect, which the mother failed to rebut with a credible explanation for the child's injuries.

Neglect ProceedingFamily Court Act Article 10Appellate ReviewFact-FindingDispositional HearingsOrder of ProtectionDue ProcessAdmissions as EvidencePrima Facie CasePreponderance of Evidence
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Washington Heights—West Harlem—Inwood Mental Health Council, Inc. v. District 1199, National Union of Hospital & Health Care Employees, RWDSU

This District Court opinion addresses motions by the Washington Heights Mental Health Council to amend its complaint and by District 1199 to enforce an arbitration award. Previously, the court vacated an award reinstating Edward Lane with back pay, but the Second Circuit reversed and remanded. The court now finds an oral collective bargaining agreement existed, generally requiring enforcement of the arbitration award. However, new serious allegations against Lane, if proven, could justify discharge. A strong public policy against reinstating a mental health worker accused of sexually molesting patients warrants staying his reinstatement pending arbitration of these new claims. Despite this, the court orders the Council to comply with the back pay portion of the arbitration award, finding no public policy violation in that aspect.

Arbitration Award EnforcementCollective Bargaining AgreementBack PayReinstatement StayedSexual Misconduct AllegationsPublic Policy ExceptionLabor DisputeAmended ComplaintFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureRemand Order
References
11
Case No. ADJ12239828 (MF); ADJ12514900
Regular
Apr 17, 2023

LETICIA RIVERA GUTIERREZ vs. LABORNOW INC, GALLAGHER BASSETT GOLD RIVER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the original Findings and Award concerning attorney fees for both adjudication numbers. The Board adopted and incorporated the WCJ's report, affirming the findings and award with the specified amendments. Specifically, Finding of Fact 8 was modified for ADJ12239828 to reflect an attorney fee of $5,698.50 plus 15% of temporary disability, and for ADJ125149008, to reflect an attorney fee of $913.50. The Board denied the defendant's petition on the issue of apportionment, finding they failed to meet their burden of proof.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of FactAwardAttorney FeeTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityApportionmentLabor Code § 5705Labor Code § 4663
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 18, 2001

Dutton v. Charles Pankow Builders, Ltd.

This case involved an amended judgment from the Supreme Court, New York County, concerning personal injury damages awarded to two construction workers. The judgment apportioned liability 20% against the general contractor and 80% against the subcontractor/employer. The court reviewed post-trial motions from the subcontractor to dismiss a contractual indemnification claim by the general contractor and motions from both parties to set aside future lost earnings awards as excessive. The court unanimously affirmed the amended judgment, finding the indemnification clause enforceable as it allowed for partial, not full, indemnification. The apportionment of liability was also upheld, supported by evidence of negligence from both the general contractor and the subcontractor. Additionally, the court found the awards for future lost earnings, including evidence of reasonably certain wage increases and application of CPLR 5041 (e) adjustment, to be proper.

Construction injuryPersonal injury damagesContractual indemnificationLiability apportionmentLost earnings awardGeneral contractor negligenceSubcontractor negligenceIndemnification clause enforceabilityStatutory interpretationAppellate review
References
4
Case No. ADJ10008098
Regular
Feb 06, 2017

YVETTE SALDIVAR vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the judge's findings of fact and award. While the defendant argued against the applicant's burden of proof, the WCJ's credibility finding, and the award of temporary disability instead of Industrial Disability Leave, the Board ultimately amended the findings. The Board found that the applicant sustained a cumulative trauma injury to her psyche through January 28, 2014, arising out of and in the course of employment, affirming the rest of the original award.

PSYCHE INJURYCUMULATIVE TRAUMASPECIFIC INJURYTEMPORARY DISABILITY INDEMNITYINDUSTRIAL DISABILITY LEAVERECONSIDERATIONFINDINGS AND AWARDWORKERS' COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGEAPPEALS BOARDBURDEN OF PROOF
References
2
Case No. ADJ6699348
Regular
Mar 17, 2016

KANON MONKIEWICZ vs. RM STORE FIXTURES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) issued a Notice of Intention to find that Labor Code section 4903.8(a) does not preclude awards to lien claimants Rx Funding Solutions, LLC and PharmaFinance, LLC. This is because the 2014 amendments to section 4903.8(a)(2) specify that it does not apply to assignments completed prior to January 1, 2013. Both of the lien claimants' assignments were made before this date, thus exempting them from the preclusion. The WCAB is amending its previous order and returning the case to the trial level for further proceedings on the merits of the liens.

Labor Code 4903.8Lien claimantsAssignment of receivablesCessation of businessPharmacy lienMedical lienSB 863AB 2732Prospective vs. retrospective applicationWCAB rules
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 16, 1990

Continental Building Co. v. Town of North Salem

This case concerns an amended order regarding the award of attorney's fees under 42 USC § 1988. The court re-affirmed its previous finding that the plaintiff was a 'prevailing party' and that no 'special circumstances' existed to deny the award, rejecting arguments regarding defendants' good faith, plaintiff's financial ability, or third-party contributions. The court then determined the reasonableness of the fees, finding the hours expended and the hourly rate to be appropriate. Despite the 'lodestar fee' calculation, the court, exercising its discretion, reduced the final award to prevent overpricing litigation, ultimately granting $318,977.78 in attorney's fees and $73,022.22 in disbursements and expenses.

Civil RightsAttorney's FeesPrevailing PartySpecial CircumstancesLodestar MethodDisbursementsExpert Witness FeesSection 1983Section 1988Exclusionary Zoning
References
32
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of I-Conscious R. (George S.)

This case involves an appeal concerning a Family Court order that determined a respondent father abused and neglected his daughter and derivatively abused and neglected his son. The appellate court affirmed the fact-finding order, concluding that the petitioner presented a preponderance of evidence, including medical findings of genital herpes in the child, indicative of sexual abuse. The court upheld the neglect finding due to the father's failure to secure timely medical care for his daughter's severe symptoms. Additionally, the respondent's arguments regarding the suggestiveness of interviews, the testimony of his expert witness, and claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were all rejected by the court. An appeal against a separate order of protection was dismissed due to abandonment.

Child AbuseChild NeglectSexual AbuseGenital HerpesMedical EvidenceFamily Court ProceedingsSufficiency of EvidenceCredibility AssessmentIneffective Assistance of CounselAppellate Review
References
8
Case No. ADJ10160405
Regular
Dec 17, 2019

JEFFREY JENSEN vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This decision addresses Jeffrey Jensen's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Transportation. The Appeals Board affirmed the prior findings and award with a minor amendment. The amendment clarifies that the applicant stipulated to sustaining injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment to his head, neck, low back, shoulders, and knees. This amendment ensures consistency with the stipulated facts and awarded benefits.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationStipulationAOE/COEAmended Findings and AwardSupervising Environmental PlannerCalifornia Department of TransportationLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundHead Injury
References
0
Case No. ADJ132220 (SAL 0092874)
Regular
Mar 21, 2014

JOHN RAMIREZ vs. AMIRA MEDICAL, INC.; ACE USA, administered by ESIS

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by applicant John Ramirez. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the prior decision. Specifically, it deleted Finding of Fact 11 and amended Findings 5, 9, and 10, clarifying temporary disability dates and attorney fees. The award was also amended to reflect permanent total disability and the attorney's fee structure, with further orders for commutation calculations.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeAMIRA MEDICALINC.ACE USAESISPermanent Disability AwardTemporary Disability
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 22,087 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational