CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8209565
Regular
Feb 20, 2013

MARIA ARRIOLA vs. DOLE FRESH VEGETABLES, SPECIALTY RISK

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order dismisses Maria Arriola's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found the petition was not taken from a final order and was untimely filed. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.

Petition for ReconsiderationFinal OrderTimely-FiledWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeDismissedADJ8209565Dole Fresh VegetablesSpecialty RiskDeidra E. Lowe
References
0
Case No. ADJ12634746
Regular
Nov 07, 2025

BLANCA ARRIOLA vs. OAK VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, BETA HEALTHCARE GROUP

The applicant, Blanca Arriola, filed a pro per Petition for Reconsideration on August 25, 2025, challenging a decision from June 20, 2025, despite being represented by counsel. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board found the petition to be untimely, as it exceeded the 25-day statutory limit for filing. Consequently, the Board dismissed the petition due to lack of jurisdiction. The decision also clarified recent amendments to Labor Code section 5909 concerning the Appeals Board's 60-day action period and notification requirements for case transmission.

Petition for ReconsiderationPro Per FilingUntimely PetitionLabor Code § 5909Appeals BoardTransmission of CaseElectronic Adjudication Management System (EAMS)Case EventsProof of ServiceReport
References
9
Case No. ADJ593283 (AHM 0117827) ADJ1747148 (AHM 0117828) ADJ196184 (AHM 0117826)
Regular
Aug 01, 2011

DEBORAH ARRIOLA-LARA vs. NORDSTROMS; Permissibly Self-Insured

The Appeals Board denied Nordstrom's Petition for Removal seeking to overturn an order allowing applicant's supplemental deposition at her attorney's office. The Board found the petition lacked merit. However, the Board sua sponte granted removal on the limited issue of sanctions against Nordstrom's counsel. This action stems from counsel's inclusion of numerous extraneous and previously filed documents in their 114-page petition, constituting a violation of procedural rules and potentially a frivolous tactic warranting sanctions.

Petition for RemovalSupplemental DepositionDue Process ViolationCode of Civil Procedure Section 2025.250Good CauseWCAB Rule 10842(c)Labor Code Section 5813Bad-Faith ActionsFrivolous TacticsUnnecessary Delay
References
4
Case No. ADJ828729 (VNO 0514052)
Regular
Feb 11, 2010

LEONEL ARRIOLA vs. SPRINT PCS NEXTEL, CNA RISK MANAGEMENT

Applicant sought reconsideration of a November 24, 2009, Findings and Award which found an industrial injury to the back, neurologic system, headaches, and ears, but excluded psychological injury. The WCJ later vacated that award due to clerical error. Applicant's petition for reconsideration, filed after the award was vacated, is therefore moot. The Board dismissed the petition and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.

WCABArriolaSprint PCS NextelCNA Risk ManagementPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardWCJindustrial injuryback injuryneurologic system
References
0
Showing 1-4 of 4 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational